Abstract
Within the last two decades, scholars have studied public opinion on racial profiling in multiple contexts, yet there have been limited studies that have examined whether public opinion on racial profiling is consistent across these unique contexts. Using a random sample of White adults from Pennsylvania, we studied whether perceptions on the discriminatory nature of racial profiling, and the perceived effectiveness of this practice in airports, retail settings, and traffic stops, form two distinct latent measures. We found that perceptions of racial profiling as discriminatory are general across these multiple contexts; the same was found to be true for perceptions of effectiveness as well. These latent measures also had different correlates by age and gender.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 491-507 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Crime and Justice |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the generality of public opinion on racial profiling: A statewide study of white perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver