TY - JOUR
T1 - Revitalizing urban waterfronts
T2 - identifying indicators for human well-being
AU - Yocom, Ken P.
AU - Andrews, Leann
AU - Faghin, Nicole
AU - Dyson, Karen
AU - Leschine, Thomas
AU - Nam, Jungho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Ken P. Yocom et al.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Waterfront cities worldwide have begun the process of regenerating and developing their formerly industrial waterfronts into land uses that reflect a post-industrial economic vision of mixed urban uses supporting a diverse economy and wide range of infrastructure. These revitalization projects require distinct planning and management tactics to determine project-defined successes inclusive of economic, ecological, and human well-being perspectives. While empirically developed templates for economic and ecological measures exist, the multi-dimensionality and subjective nature of human well-being is more difficult to assess. Through an extensive review of indicator frameworks and expert interviews, our research proposes an organizational, yet adaptable, human well-being indicators framework for the management and development of urban waterfront revitalization projects. We analyze the framework through the lens of two waterfront projects in the Puget Sound region of the United States and identify several key factors necessary to developing project-specific human well-being indicator frameworks for urban waterfront revitalization projects. These factors include: initially specify goals and objectives of a given project, acknowledge contextual conditions including prospective land uses and projected users, identify the stage of development or management to use appropriate indicators for that stage, and develop and utilize data sources that are at a similar scale to the size of the project.
AB - Waterfront cities worldwide have begun the process of regenerating and developing their formerly industrial waterfronts into land uses that reflect a post-industrial economic vision of mixed urban uses supporting a diverse economy and wide range of infrastructure. These revitalization projects require distinct planning and management tactics to determine project-defined successes inclusive of economic, ecological, and human well-being perspectives. While empirically developed templates for economic and ecological measures exist, the multi-dimensionality and subjective nature of human well-being is more difficult to assess. Through an extensive review of indicator frameworks and expert interviews, our research proposes an organizational, yet adaptable, human well-being indicators framework for the management and development of urban waterfront revitalization projects. We analyze the framework through the lens of two waterfront projects in the Puget Sound region of the United States and identify several key factors necessary to developing project-specific human well-being indicator frameworks for urban waterfront revitalization projects. These factors include: initially specify goals and objectives of a given project, acknowledge contextual conditions including prospective land uses and projected users, identify the stage of development or management to use appropriate indicators for that stage, and develop and utilize data sources that are at a similar scale to the size of the project.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85072568382
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85072568382#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.456
DO - 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.456
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85072568382
SN - 2372-0352
VL - 3
SP - 456
EP - 473
JO - AIMS Environmental Science
JF - AIMS Environmental Science
IS - 3
ER -