TY - JOUR
T1 - Rightsizing root phenotypes for drought resistance
AU - Lynch, Jonathan P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Support was provided by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture competitive grants 2014-67013-2157 and 11327514, and USDOE ARPA-E grant AR0000821. I thank Kathleen Brown, Hannah Schneider, and Christopher Strock for helpful comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/6/6
Y1 - 2018/6/6
N2 - I propose that reduced root development would be advantageous for drought resistance in high-input agroecosystems. Selection regimes for crop ancestors and landraces include multiple stresses, intense competition, and variable resource distribution, which favored prolific root production, developmental plasticity in response to resource availability, and maintenance of unspecialized root tissues. High-input agroecosystems have removed many of these constraints to root function. Therefore, root phenotypes that focus on water capture at the expense of ancestral adaptations would be better suited to high-input agroecosystems. Parsimonious architectural phenotypes include fewer axial roots, reduced density of lateral roots, reduced growth responsiveness to local resource availability, and greater loss of roots that do not contribute to water capture. Parsimonious anatomical phenotypes include a reduced number of cortical cell files, greater loss of cortical parenchyma to aerenchyma and senescence, and larger cortical cell size. Parsimonious root phenotypes may be less useful in low-input agroecosystems, which are characterized by multiple challenges and trade-offs for root function in addition to water capture. Analysis of the fitness landscape of root phenotypes is a complex challenge that will be aided by the development of robust functional-structural models capable of simulating the dynamics of root-soil interactions.
AB - I propose that reduced root development would be advantageous for drought resistance in high-input agroecosystems. Selection regimes for crop ancestors and landraces include multiple stresses, intense competition, and variable resource distribution, which favored prolific root production, developmental plasticity in response to resource availability, and maintenance of unspecialized root tissues. High-input agroecosystems have removed many of these constraints to root function. Therefore, root phenotypes that focus on water capture at the expense of ancestral adaptations would be better suited to high-input agroecosystems. Parsimonious architectural phenotypes include fewer axial roots, reduced density of lateral roots, reduced growth responsiveness to local resource availability, and greater loss of roots that do not contribute to water capture. Parsimonious anatomical phenotypes include a reduced number of cortical cell files, greater loss of cortical parenchyma to aerenchyma and senescence, and larger cortical cell size. Parsimonious root phenotypes may be less useful in low-input agroecosystems, which are characterized by multiple challenges and trade-offs for root function in addition to water capture. Analysis of the fitness landscape of root phenotypes is a complex challenge that will be aided by the development of robust functional-structural models capable of simulating the dynamics of root-soil interactions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048614268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048614268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jxb/ery048
DO - 10.1093/jxb/ery048
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29471525
AN - SCOPUS:85048614268
SN - 0022-0957
VL - 69
SP - 3279
EP - 3292
JO - Journal of experimental botany
JF - Journal of experimental botany
IS - 13
ER -