TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk-reducing surgery in FAP
T2 - Role for surgeons beyond the incision
AU - Neuman, H. B.
AU - Robbins, L.
AU - Duarte, J.
AU - Charlson, M. E.
AU - Weiser, M. R.
AU - Guillem, J. G.
AU - Wong, W. D.
AU - Temple, L. K.
PY - 2010/6/1
Y1 - 2010/6/1
N2 - Background: Although primary therapy in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is surgical, little is known about patients' surgical decision-making experience. The objective was to explore the decision-making process surrounding risk-reducing surgery in FAP using qualitative methodology. Methods: In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 14 FAP patients and 11 healthcare providers with experience caring for FAP patients were conducted. Using grounded theory, line-by-line content analysis identified categories from which themes describing patients' experiences emerged; analysis continued until data saturation. Results: Median age at surgery was 23 (7-37) years; at interview 41 (19-74) years. Two patients underwent surgery secondary to cancer, the remainder for risk-reduction. Content experts included colorectal surgeons (3), geneticists (2), gastroenterologists (3), nurses (3). Three themes emerged: Information: Family was the primary information source, and patients' level of information varied. The importance of up-front information was emphasized. Influences on decision-making: Influential factors included family experiences, youth, emotional state, support, and decision-making role. Although patients often sought opinions, most (12/14) wanted an active/shared role in decision-making. Life after surgery: Patients described surgery as the "easy part," emphasizing the need for long-term relationships with care providers. Conclusions: Decisions surrounding risk-reducing surgery in FAP are unique. A decision support tool may facilitate decision-making, better preparing patients for life after surgery.
AB - Background: Although primary therapy in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is surgical, little is known about patients' surgical decision-making experience. The objective was to explore the decision-making process surrounding risk-reducing surgery in FAP using qualitative methodology. Methods: In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 14 FAP patients and 11 healthcare providers with experience caring for FAP patients were conducted. Using grounded theory, line-by-line content analysis identified categories from which themes describing patients' experiences emerged; analysis continued until data saturation. Results: Median age at surgery was 23 (7-37) years; at interview 41 (19-74) years. Two patients underwent surgery secondary to cancer, the remainder for risk-reduction. Content experts included colorectal surgeons (3), geneticists (2), gastroenterologists (3), nurses (3). Three themes emerged: Information: Family was the primary information source, and patients' level of information varied. The importance of up-front information was emphasized. Influences on decision-making: Influential factors included family experiences, youth, emotional state, support, and decision-making role. Although patients often sought opinions, most (12/14) wanted an active/shared role in decision-making. Life after surgery: Patients described surgery as the "easy part," emphasizing the need for long-term relationships with care providers. Conclusions: Decisions surrounding risk-reducing surgery in FAP are unique. A decision support tool may facilitate decision-making, better preparing patients for life after surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952038806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952038806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.21556
DO - 10.1002/jso.21556
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77952038806
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 101
SP - 570
EP - 576
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 7
ER -