TY - JOUR
T1 - Rural gentrification and linked migration in the United States
AU - Nelson, Peter B.
AU - Oberg, Alexander
AU - Nelson, Lise
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number BCS-0851375 . The authors are also grateful for the support of USDA’s Economic Research Service and to John Cromartie who provided valuable comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or USDA.
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Although gentrification is a process commonly associated with urban landscapes, rural areas in advanced economies have also experienced gentrification over the past two decades. Largely based on case study approaches, the Rural Studies literature describes transformations in the housing market, changed cultural attitudes toward the environment, political conflicts surrounding land-use planning, and heightened class polarization as outcomes of rural gentrification. The analysis in this paper extends our understandings of rural gentrification in two fundamental ways. First, drawing on US census data from 1990 and 2000, the paper systematically examines gentrification in nonmetropolitan counties across the United States and develops a methodology for identifying areas with similarly strong evidence of gentrification. The second section of the analysis compares the geographic distribution and socioeconomic change in gentrifying counties with the rest of nonmetropolitan America emphasizing the changes in the baby boomer and Latino populations. In so doing, the analysis opens up new possibilities for comparative analysis of gentrification both between and within countries, connects our understandings of rural gentrification to other processes of globalization playing out within rural space, and argues for work on rural gentrification to more explicitly integrate questions surrounding race and ethnicity alongside questions of class.
AB - Although gentrification is a process commonly associated with urban landscapes, rural areas in advanced economies have also experienced gentrification over the past two decades. Largely based on case study approaches, the Rural Studies literature describes transformations in the housing market, changed cultural attitudes toward the environment, political conflicts surrounding land-use planning, and heightened class polarization as outcomes of rural gentrification. The analysis in this paper extends our understandings of rural gentrification in two fundamental ways. First, drawing on US census data from 1990 and 2000, the paper systematically examines gentrification in nonmetropolitan counties across the United States and develops a methodology for identifying areas with similarly strong evidence of gentrification. The second section of the analysis compares the geographic distribution and socioeconomic change in gentrifying counties with the rest of nonmetropolitan America emphasizing the changes in the baby boomer and Latino populations. In so doing, the analysis opens up new possibilities for comparative analysis of gentrification both between and within countries, connects our understandings of rural gentrification to other processes of globalization playing out within rural space, and argues for work on rural gentrification to more explicitly integrate questions surrounding race and ethnicity alongside questions of class.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149465522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149465522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:78149465522
SN - 0743-0167
VL - 26
SP - 343
EP - 352
JO - Journal of Rural Studies
JF - Journal of Rural Studies
IS - 4
ER -