Russian and US Missile Defenses: Continuing Contention or Possible Progress?

Stephen J. Cimbala

doi:10.1080/09662830802603027

Russian and US Missile Defenses: Continuing Contention or Possible Progress?

Stephen J. Cimbala

Penn State Brandywine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The United States and Russia can, and should, get on with the business of reducing their numbers of deployed strategic nuclear weapons. Missile defenses planned for deployment by the United States in Eastern Europe have provoked energetic Russian skepticism. But Russian and American interests lie in cooperation on missile defense, as well as on nonproliferation and offensive arms limitations.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	435-453
Number of pages	19
Journal	European Security
Volume	17
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830802603027
State	Published - 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Political Science and International Relations

Access to Document

10.1080/09662830802603027

Cite this

@article{943c8a88b8d942538b166984f5ce66ed,

title = "Russian and US Missile Defenses: Continuing Contention or Possible Progress?",

abstract = "The United States and Russia can, and should, get on with the business of reducing their numbers of deployed strategic nuclear weapons. Missile defenses planned for deployment by the United States in Eastern Europe have provoked energetic Russian skepticism. But Russian and American interests lie in cooperation on missile defense, as well as on nonproliferation and offensive arms limitations.",

author = "Cimbala, {Stephen J.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2008, Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.1080/09662830802603027",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "17",

pages = "435--453",

journal = "European Security",

issn = "0966-2839",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Russian and US Missile Defenses

T2 - Continuing Contention or Possible Progress?

AU - Cimbala, Stephen J.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The United States and Russia can, and should, get on with the business of reducing their numbers of deployed strategic nuclear weapons. Missile defenses planned for deployment by the United States in Eastern Europe have provoked energetic Russian skepticism. But Russian and American interests lie in cooperation on missile defense, as well as on nonproliferation and offensive arms limitations.

AB - The United States and Russia can, and should, get on with the business of reducing their numbers of deployed strategic nuclear weapons. Missile defenses planned for deployment by the United States in Eastern Europe have provoked energetic Russian skepticism. But Russian and American interests lie in cooperation on missile defense, as well as on nonproliferation and offensive arms limitations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050174628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050174628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09662830802603027

DO - 10.1080/09662830802603027

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050174628

SN - 0966-2839

VL - 17

SP - 435

EP - 453

JO - European Security

JF - European Security

IS - 4

ER -

Russian and US Missile Defenses: Continuing Contention or Possible Progress?

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this