TY - JOUR
T1 - Sampling over nonuniform distributions
T2 - A neural efficiency account of the primacy effect in statistical learning
AU - Karuza, Elisabeth A.
AU - Li, Ping
AU - Weiss, Daniel J.
AU - Bulgarelli, Federica
AU - Zinszer, Benjamin D.
AU - Aslin, Richard N.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by an NIH grant to R. N. A. (HD-037082), an NSF grant to P. L. (BCS-1349110), an NIH grant to D. J. W. (HD-067250), and NSF GRFs to E. A. K. and F. B. We are grateful to Alex Teghipco for assistance in data collection at the University of Rochester and to Uri Hasson for helpful comments on this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Successful knowledge acquisition requires a cognitive system that is both sensitive to statistical information and able to distinguish among multiple structures (i.e., to detect pattern shifts and form distinct representations). Extensive behavioral evidence has highlighted the importance of cues to structural change, demonstrating how, without them, learners fail to detect pattern shifts and are biased in favor of early experience. Here, we seek a neural account of the mechanism underpinning this primacy effect in learning. During fMRI scanning, adult participants were presented with two artificial languages: a familiar language (L1) on which they had been pretrained followed by a novel language (L2). The languages were composed of the same syllable inventory organized according to unique statistical structures. In the absence of cues to the transition between languages, posttest familiarity judgments revealed that learners on average more accurately segmented words fromthe familiar language compared with the novel one. Univariate activation and functional connectivity analyses showed that participants with the strongest learning of L1 had decreased recruitment of fronto-subcortical and posterior parietal regions, in addition to a dissociation between downstream regions and early auditory cortex. Participants with a strong new language learning capacity (i.e., higher L2 scores) showed the opposite trend. Thus, we suggest that a bias toward neural efficiency, particularly as manifested by decreased sampling from the environment, accounts for the primacy effect in learning. Potential implications of this hypothesis are discussed, including the possibility that “inefficient” learning systemsmay be more sensitive to structural changes in a dynamic environment.
AB - Successful knowledge acquisition requires a cognitive system that is both sensitive to statistical information and able to distinguish among multiple structures (i.e., to detect pattern shifts and form distinct representations). Extensive behavioral evidence has highlighted the importance of cues to structural change, demonstrating how, without them, learners fail to detect pattern shifts and are biased in favor of early experience. Here, we seek a neural account of the mechanism underpinning this primacy effect in learning. During fMRI scanning, adult participants were presented with two artificial languages: a familiar language (L1) on which they had been pretrained followed by a novel language (L2). The languages were composed of the same syllable inventory organized according to unique statistical structures. In the absence of cues to the transition between languages, posttest familiarity judgments revealed that learners on average more accurately segmented words fromthe familiar language compared with the novel one. Univariate activation and functional connectivity analyses showed that participants with the strongest learning of L1 had decreased recruitment of fronto-subcortical and posterior parietal regions, in addition to a dissociation between downstream regions and early auditory cortex. Participants with a strong new language learning capacity (i.e., higher L2 scores) showed the opposite trend. Thus, we suggest that a bias toward neural efficiency, particularly as manifested by decreased sampling from the environment, accounts for the primacy effect in learning. Potential implications of this hypothesis are discussed, including the possibility that “inefficient” learning systemsmay be more sensitive to structural changes in a dynamic environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984993540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984993540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/jocn_a_00990
DO - 10.1162/jocn_a_00990
M3 - Article
C2 - 27315265
AN - SCOPUS:84984993540
SN - 0898-929X
VL - 28
SP - 1484
EP - 1500
JO - Journal of cognitive neuroscience
JF - Journal of cognitive neuroscience
IS - 10
ER -