TY - JOUR
T1 - Satellite constellation design tradeoffs using multiple-objective evolutionary computation
AU - Ferringer, Matthew P.
AU - Spencer, David B.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Aerospace Corporation is acknowledged for providing the financial means to complete this research. Thanks are extended to Patrick Reed for sharing his expertise on, and providing an excellent introduction to, evolutionary computation. The guidance of Thomas Starchville, Roger Thompson, Peter Palmadesso, and Ronald Clifton is greatly appreciated.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Multiple-objective evolutionary computation provides the satellite constellation designer with an essential optimization tool due to the discontinuous, temporal, and/or nonlinear characteristics of the metrics that architectures are evaluated against. In this work, the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm 2 (NSGA-2) is used to generate sets of constellation designs (Pareto fronts) that show the tradeoff for two pairs of conflicting metrics. The first pair replicates a previously published sparse-coverage tradeoff to establish a baseline for tool development, whereas the second characterizes the conflict between temporal (revisit time) and spatial (image quality) resolution. A thorough parameter analysis is performed on the NSGA-2 for the constellation design problem so that the utility of the approach may be assessed and general guidelines for use established. The approximated Pareto fronts generated for each tradeoff are discussed, and the trends exhibited by the nondominated designs are revealed.
AB - Multiple-objective evolutionary computation provides the satellite constellation designer with an essential optimization tool due to the discontinuous, temporal, and/or nonlinear characteristics of the metrics that architectures are evaluated against. In this work, the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm 2 (NSGA-2) is used to generate sets of constellation designs (Pareto fronts) that show the tradeoff for two pairs of conflicting metrics. The first pair replicates a previously published sparse-coverage tradeoff to establish a baseline for tool development, whereas the second characterizes the conflict between temporal (revisit time) and spatial (image quality) resolution. A thorough parameter analysis is performed on the NSGA-2 for the constellation design problem so that the utility of the approach may be assessed and general guidelines for use established. The approximated Pareto fronts generated for each tradeoff are discussed, and the trends exhibited by the nondominated designs are revealed.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33846107773
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846107773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/1.18788
DO - 10.2514/1.18788
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33846107773
SN - 0022-4650
VL - 43
SP - 1404
EP - 1411
JO - Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
JF - Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
IS - 6
ER -