Abstract
Differentiation between cloud cover and snow surfaces using remotely sensed data is complicated by the similarity of their radiative temperatures, and also by their similar reflectanccs at visible wavelengths. A method of cloud analysis over snow-covered regions is presented, using 1.51 – 1.63 μm data from an experimental sensor on board a U.S. Air Force Defense Meteorological Satellite Program platform. At these wavelengths, snow appears relatively ‘black’ while clouds are highly reflective. The spatial structure of the 1.51-1.63 μm reflectivity fields over a continuous snow surface are examined. Plots of mean reflectance against coefficients of variation for 4×4 pixel areas reveals a cluster of points have low reflectivity and low variability, corresponding to snow-covered (cloud free) areas, and a similar cluster with high reflectances corresponding to 100 per cent cloud cover. For the case of a single layered cloud, the radiances associated with partially filled fields of view are also inferred.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 213-223 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Remote Sensing |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1984 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Satellite discrimination of snow/cloud surfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver