TY - JOUR
T1 - Scaffolding Reflection and Articulation of Scientific Explanations in a Data-Rich, Project-Based Learning Environment
T2 - An Investigation of Progress Portfolio
AU - Land, Susan M.
AU - Zembal-Saul, Carla
N1 - Funding Information:
Susan Land [sland@psu.edu] and Carla Zembal-Saul [czem@psu.edu] are with the Instructional Systems Program and Elementary Science Education Program, respectively, at Penn State University. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF REC 9980055, which was granted to the second author. Any opinions,
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - In this study, we examined how learners developed scientific explanations about light with the assistance of various technology-based seaffolds. The study emphasis was on scaffolding processes of reflection and articulation. We used a content-neutral software program (Progress Portfolio) to create the instructional scaffolds. A qualitative research design was used to investigate two pairs of prospective teachers in a science content course in engineering. Our findings suggested that the computer-based scaffolds used in our study were useful to support articulation, reflection, and revision of explanations, when certain conditions were met. A major theme of our findings relates to interacting effects among learner characteristics, teacher coaching, software scaffolding design, and task characteristics.
AB - In this study, we examined how learners developed scientific explanations about light with the assistance of various technology-based seaffolds. The study emphasis was on scaffolding processes of reflection and articulation. We used a content-neutral software program (Progress Portfolio) to create the instructional scaffolds. A qualitative research design was used to investigate two pairs of prospective teachers in a science content course in engineering. Our findings suggested that the computer-based scaffolds used in our study were useful to support articulation, reflection, and revision of explanations, when certain conditions were met. A major theme of our findings relates to interacting effects among learner characteristics, teacher coaching, software scaffolding design, and task characteristics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1142289755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1142289755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF02504544
DO - 10.1007/BF02504544
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:1142289755
SN - 1042-1629
VL - 51
SP - 65
EP - 84
JO - Educational Technology Research and Development
JF - Educational Technology Research and Development
IS - 4
ER -