Scoping review of interventions for children who require augmentative and alternative communication is limited by focus on randomized controlled trials

Kathryn D R Drager, Christine Holyfield

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This review provides a summary and appraisal commentary on the treatment review by Costantino, M., & Bonati, M. (2014). A scoping review of interventions to supplement spoken communication for children with limited speech or language skills. PLoS ONE, 9, 1–15. Source of funding and declaration of interests: Christine Holyfield was supported by funding from the Penn State AAC Leadership Project, a doctoral training grant funded by U.S. Department of Education [grant #H325D110008]. The original authors report no conflicts of interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-65
Number of pages7
JournalEvidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scoping review of interventions for children who require augmentative and alternative communication is limited by focus on randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this