TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for Alzheimer's disease
T2 - The memory impairment screen versus the conventional three-word memory test
AU - Kuslansky, Gail
AU - Buschke, Herman
AU - Katz, Mindy
AU - Sliwinski, Martin
AU - Lipton, Richard B.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To improve screening for Alzheimer's disease (AD) with the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), a 4-minute, four-item delayed free and cued recall memory test with controlled learning and high discriminative validity. To assess the discriminative validity of the MIS for AD and to compare it with the conventional three-word memory test, a delayed free recall task, widely recommended as a dementia-screening test in clinical practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study nested within a longitudinal study of aging and dementia. The MIS and the standard three-word memory task were administered as part of a comprehensive neurological and neuropsychological evaluation. SETTING: Einstein Aging Study at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty community-dwelling older adults. MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated for the MIS and three-word memory test as screening tests for AD. RESULTS: In comparison with the three-word memory task, the MIS had higher sensitivity (.86 vs .65), higher specificity (.97 vs .85), and greater PPV (.80 vs .37) as a screen for AD. CONCLUSIONS: The MIS had high discriminative validity as a screening test for AD and substantially outperformed the three-word memory task. Given its validity and brevity, the MIS has important advantages as an AD screen for use in primary care.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To improve screening for Alzheimer's disease (AD) with the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), a 4-minute, four-item delayed free and cued recall memory test with controlled learning and high discriminative validity. To assess the discriminative validity of the MIS for AD and to compare it with the conventional three-word memory test, a delayed free recall task, widely recommended as a dementia-screening test in clinical practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study nested within a longitudinal study of aging and dementia. The MIS and the standard three-word memory task were administered as part of a comprehensive neurological and neuropsychological evaluation. SETTING: Einstein Aging Study at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty community-dwelling older adults. MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated for the MIS and three-word memory test as screening tests for AD. RESULTS: In comparison with the three-word memory task, the MIS had higher sensitivity (.86 vs .65), higher specificity (.97 vs .85), and greater PPV (.80 vs .37) as a screen for AD. CONCLUSIONS: The MIS had high discriminative validity as a screening test for AD and substantially outperformed the three-word memory task. Given its validity and brevity, the MIS has important advantages as an AD screen for use in primary care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036085436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036085436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50265.x
DO - 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50265.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 12110070
AN - SCOPUS:0036085436
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 50
SP - 1086
EP - 1091
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 6
ER -