TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening in High Schools to Identify, Evaluate, and Lower Depression among Adolescents
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Sekhar, Deepa L.
AU - Schaefer, Eric W.
AU - Waxmonsky, James G.
AU - Walker-Harding, Leslie R.
AU - Pattison, Krista L.
AU - Molinari, Alissa
AU - Rosen, Perri
AU - Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Our research team is acutely aware of the concerns the topic of adolescent depression screening may raise among school staff, providers, parents and adolescents. We have had ample opportunity in our pilot work to discuss and address many of these issues as outlined below. First, from April-Sept 2016 we conducted eight focus groups (7-10 participants each, n=62) to better understand the perspective of key stakeholders regarding Whole Child Health, specifically the importance of both physical and mental wellness. These focus groups included 2 parent groups, 2 school nurse groups, 2 groups of school teachers and administrators and 2 groups of medical providers (pediatrics and family medicine). The work was funded by the Penn State Social Science Research Institute-Children, Youth and Families Consortium. Participant conversations were instrumental in shaping the current proposal. In addition, following the aforementioned focus groups, we conducted a Community Engagement Studio in August 2017 funded by the Penn State Center for Translational Science Institute. These 2 hour sessions are specifically intended to inform grant proposals that depend upon successful community engagement. Participant perspectives ranged from adolescent to parent, school staff, the leaders of two mental health and suicide prevention organizations (Aevidum and the Jana Marie Foundation), a Behavioral Health Managed Care company representative and the project director of PeŶŶƐLJůǀĂŶŝĂ ?Ɛ 'ĂƌƌĞƚƚ >ĞĞ Smith Youth Suicide Prevention Grant in addition to our Penn State Research team.
Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This work was supported in part by award AD-2017C3-8752 from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (Dr Sekhar). Complementary, yet distinct portions of the study were also supported by award R40MC31765 from the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services totaling $900 000 (Dr Sekhar) with 0% financed with nongovernmental sources. The use of REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) in this project was supported by grant UL1 TR002014 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: In the past 3 years, Dr Sekhar reported receiving funding from Pfizer through the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, and a Eugene Washington Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Engagement Award. In the past 3 years, Dr Waxmonsky reported receiving research funding from Supernus and consulting with Intracellular Therapeutics and Adlon Pharmaceuticals. Dr Kraschnewski reported receiving grants from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study and grants from Merck outside the submitted work, and she reported currently serving on an advisory board for Sanofi to address health disparities for influenza vaccination in primary care. No other disclosures were reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11/4
Y1 - 2021/11/4
N2 - Importance: Adolescent major depressive disorder (MDD) prevalence has nearly doubled in the past decade. The US Preventive Services Task Force endorses universal adolescent MDD screening in primary care; however, most adolescents lack preventive health care, resulting in worsening disparities in MDD screening and treatment. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of universal adolescent MDD screening in the school setting in an effort to reduce disparities and improve MDD identification and treatment initiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial, conducted from November 6, 2018, to November 20, 2020, compared the usual school practice of targeted or selected screening based on observable behaviors of concern with universal MDD screening. Students within an identified school were randomized by grade to 1 of the 2 study groups. Study groups were compared using mixed-effects logistic regression. Participants included students in grades 9 through 12 enrolled at 1 of the 14 participating Pennsylvania public high schools. Interventions: In targeted screening, students with behaviors prompting concern for MDD were referred to the Student Assistance Program (SAP), mandated in all Pennsylvania schools. The SAP determined follow-up recommendations. In universal screening, all students completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); students with positive scores proceeded to SAP. The universal screening group could also have targeted referral to SAP for concerning behavior independent of the PHQ-9. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was initiation of MDD treatment or services based on data collected by school SAP teams during the academic year. Results: A total of 12909 students were included (median age, 16 years [range, 13-21 years]; 6963 male [53.9%]), of whom 2687 (20.8%) were Hispanic, 2891 (22.4%) were non-Hispanic Black, 5842 (45.3%) were non-Hispanic White, and 1489 (11.5%) were multiracial or of other race or ethnicity. A total of 6473 students (50.1%) were randomized to universal screening, and 6436 (49.9%) were randomized to targeted screening. Adolescents in the universal screening group had 5.92 times higher odds (95% CI, 5.07-6.93) of being identified with MDD symptoms, 3.30 times higher odds (95% CI, 2.49-4.38) of SAP confirming follow-up needs, and 2.07 times higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-3.10) of initiating MDD treatment. No differences were identified in initiation for planned subgroup analyses by sex or race and ethnicity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, universal school-based MDD screening successfully increased identification of MDD symptoms and treatment initiation among adolescents, confirming the value of this approach to address this rising public health concern. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03716869.
AB - Importance: Adolescent major depressive disorder (MDD) prevalence has nearly doubled in the past decade. The US Preventive Services Task Force endorses universal adolescent MDD screening in primary care; however, most adolescents lack preventive health care, resulting in worsening disparities in MDD screening and treatment. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of universal adolescent MDD screening in the school setting in an effort to reduce disparities and improve MDD identification and treatment initiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial, conducted from November 6, 2018, to November 20, 2020, compared the usual school practice of targeted or selected screening based on observable behaviors of concern with universal MDD screening. Students within an identified school were randomized by grade to 1 of the 2 study groups. Study groups were compared using mixed-effects logistic regression. Participants included students in grades 9 through 12 enrolled at 1 of the 14 participating Pennsylvania public high schools. Interventions: In targeted screening, students with behaviors prompting concern for MDD were referred to the Student Assistance Program (SAP), mandated in all Pennsylvania schools. The SAP determined follow-up recommendations. In universal screening, all students completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); students with positive scores proceeded to SAP. The universal screening group could also have targeted referral to SAP for concerning behavior independent of the PHQ-9. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was initiation of MDD treatment or services based on data collected by school SAP teams during the academic year. Results: A total of 12909 students were included (median age, 16 years [range, 13-21 years]; 6963 male [53.9%]), of whom 2687 (20.8%) were Hispanic, 2891 (22.4%) were non-Hispanic Black, 5842 (45.3%) were non-Hispanic White, and 1489 (11.5%) were multiracial or of other race or ethnicity. A total of 6473 students (50.1%) were randomized to universal screening, and 6436 (49.9%) were randomized to targeted screening. Adolescents in the universal screening group had 5.92 times higher odds (95% CI, 5.07-6.93) of being identified with MDD symptoms, 3.30 times higher odds (95% CI, 2.49-4.38) of SAP confirming follow-up needs, and 2.07 times higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-3.10) of initiating MDD treatment. No differences were identified in initiation for planned subgroup analyses by sex or race and ethnicity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, universal school-based MDD screening successfully increased identification of MDD symptoms and treatment initiation among adolescents, confirming the value of this approach to address this rising public health concern. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03716869.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118953745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118953745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31836
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31836
M3 - Article
C2 - 34739064
AN - SCOPUS:85118953745
SN - 2574-3805
VL - 4
JO - JAMA network open
JF - JAMA network open
IS - 11
M1 - e2131836
ER -