TY - JOUR
T1 - 'Screwed for life'
T2 - Examining identification and division in addiction narratives
AU - Jodlowski, Denise
AU - Sharf, Barbara F.
AU - Nguyen, Loralee Capistrano
AU - Haidet, Paul
AU - Woodard, Lechauncy D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was co-funded by grant number 3 PO1 HS10876-05S1 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Center of Minority Health and Health Disparities USA. We are indebted to the people who have posted their stories of struggling with drug addiction. After examining a preliminary sample of postings from this online discussion group, the research team was convinced that this site of naturally occurring discourse among people with the mutual problem of opiate addiction would be a rich, extensive source of information about their experiences. We recognized the participants as a vulnerable group and, though the messages generated through the Web site were publicly available on the Internet, we planned to introduce ourselves online to explain the purpose of our research and to seek permission from specific participants who we wished to quote as strategies for dealing with informed consent, confidentiality, and using content out of context (Sharf 1999; Ess and AoIRWC 2002). However, the Institutional Review Board that evaluated our proposal mandated that the only way it would approve our study was if we refrained from identifying ourselves or revealing our presence to members of the discussion group. In
PY - 2007/5/29
Y1 - 2007/5/29
N2 - In this study, we investigate the use of narrative in online conversations among persons suffering from chronic opiate addiction and evaluate both its positive and negative uses. Illness narratives, as argued by sociologist Arthur Frank and psychiatrist/medical anthropologist Arthur Kleinman, enable patients to give order to life experiences and receive support from others. We wished to explore under what circumstances online support coalesces and breaks apart. The narratives we examined exemplify two topics frequently discussed on the message board: the recovery process and what it means to be 'clean'. To better understand these narratives from a theoretically based approach, we used the work of rhetorical theorist Kenneth Burke. Burke's description of two human motives, suffering and perfection, led us to an understanding of how unification and division happened within the online community. We found that the recovery narrative primarily embodied the author's suffering and, consequently, received support from other members of the message board. The second narrative centered on what it means to be 'clean' through a discussion of the author's desire to court temptation, revealing what Burke calls the rotten nature of perfection. As a result, the author of the narrative provoked disagreements and did not receive support.
AB - In this study, we investigate the use of narrative in online conversations among persons suffering from chronic opiate addiction and evaluate both its positive and negative uses. Illness narratives, as argued by sociologist Arthur Frank and psychiatrist/medical anthropologist Arthur Kleinman, enable patients to give order to life experiences and receive support from others. We wished to explore under what circumstances online support coalesces and breaks apart. The narratives we examined exemplify two topics frequently discussed on the message board: the recovery process and what it means to be 'clean'. To better understand these narratives from a theoretically based approach, we used the work of rhetorical theorist Kenneth Burke. Burke's description of two human motives, suffering and perfection, led us to an understanding of how unification and division happened within the online community. We found that the recovery narrative primarily embodied the author's suffering and, consequently, received support from other members of the message board. The second narrative centered on what it means to be 'clean' through a discussion of the author's desire to court temptation, revealing what Burke calls the rotten nature of perfection. As a result, the author of the narrative provoked disagreements and did not receive support.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548202703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548202703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/CAM.2007.003
DO - 10.1515/CAM.2007.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 17714040
AN - SCOPUS:34548202703
SN - 1612-1783
VL - 4
SP - 15
EP - 26
JO - Communication and Medicine
JF - Communication and Medicine
IS - 1
ER -