Seabed Observations at the New England Mud Patch: Reflection and Scattering Measurements and Direct Geoacoustic Information

  • Charles W. Holland
  • , Chad M. Smith
  • , Zackary Lowe
  • , Jim Dorminy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Seabed reflection and scattering measurements were conducted at the New England Mud Patch to better understand the acoustic properties of fine-grained (muddy) sediments. The measurement philosophy and the measurements themselves are summarized. In addition, geoacoustic information accessed directly from the data in the time and frequency domains is presented. The main result is the existence of an angle of intromission. This observation proves that the mud sound speed is less than that of the water and yields a sediment sound speed ratio 0.9865 with outer bounds {0.985 0.989}. Another result is the observation of strong scattered arrivals from within the mud volume at/near normal incidence but not at low grazing angles. These are likely due to anisotropic sediment heterogeneities with a large horizontal to vertical scale. Evidence is also presented for a highly heterogeneous mud-sand horizon with lateral variability down to scales of order meters. Finally, the reflection measurements successfully capture Bragg interference patterns. Their importance is their substantial geoacoustic information content, which can be accessed by several inversion methods.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)578-593
    Number of pages16
    JournalIEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
    Volume47
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2022

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Ocean Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Seabed Observations at the New England Mud Patch: Reflection and Scattering Measurements and Direct Geoacoustic Information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this