TY - JOUR
T1 - Securing a Chest Tube Properly
T2 - A Simple Framework for Teaching Emergency Medicine Residents and Assessing Their Technical Abilities
AU - Ruparel, Raaj K.
AU - Laack, Torrey A.
AU - Brahmbhatt, Rushin D.
AU - Rowse, Phillip G.
AU - Aho, Johnathon M.
AU - AlJamal, Yazan N.
AU - Kim, Brian D.
AU - Morris, David S.
AU - Farley, David R.
AU - Campbell, Ronna L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Background Quality-improvement efforts at our institution have identified chest tube dislodgement as a preventable complication of tube thoracostomy. Because proper fixation techniques are not well described in the literature and are seldom formally taught, techniques vary among residents. Objective Our aim was to develop and test a framework for teaching and assessing chest tube securement. Methods A repeated-measures study design was used. At baseline, 19 emergency medicine residents (program years 1–3) placed and secured a chest tube in a cadaver. After a 45-min proficiency-based teaching session using a low-cost chest tube simulator (approximate cost, $5), each resident again placed and secured a chest tube in a cadaver, followed by 3-month retention testing. All securements were evaluated by two raters using a four-point checklist and a five-point global assessment scale (GAS). The checklist addressed suture selection, tying knots down to the tube, wound approximation, and tube displacement relative to skin. Results After the initial educational intervention, median scores for the group improved significantly over baseline for the GAS (p < 0.001), checklist (p < 0.001), and amount of displacement (p = 0.01). At 3 months, GAS, checklist, and displacement scores did not differ significantly from the immediate post-test scores. Inter-rater reliability was substantial, with weighted κ values of.77 for the GAS and.70 for the checklist. Conclusions Quality of chest tube securement by emergency medicine residents can be significantly improved with an inexpensive chest tube simulator and a brief workshop. The four-point checklist served as a reliable and effective means for teaching and assessing chest tube securement.
AB - Background Quality-improvement efforts at our institution have identified chest tube dislodgement as a preventable complication of tube thoracostomy. Because proper fixation techniques are not well described in the literature and are seldom formally taught, techniques vary among residents. Objective Our aim was to develop and test a framework for teaching and assessing chest tube securement. Methods A repeated-measures study design was used. At baseline, 19 emergency medicine residents (program years 1–3) placed and secured a chest tube in a cadaver. After a 45-min proficiency-based teaching session using a low-cost chest tube simulator (approximate cost, $5), each resident again placed and secured a chest tube in a cadaver, followed by 3-month retention testing. All securements were evaluated by two raters using a four-point checklist and a five-point global assessment scale (GAS). The checklist addressed suture selection, tying knots down to the tube, wound approximation, and tube displacement relative to skin. Results After the initial educational intervention, median scores for the group improved significantly over baseline for the GAS (p < 0.001), checklist (p < 0.001), and amount of displacement (p = 0.01). At 3 months, GAS, checklist, and displacement scores did not differ significantly from the immediate post-test scores. Inter-rater reliability was substantial, with weighted κ values of.77 for the GAS and.70 for the checklist. Conclusions Quality of chest tube securement by emergency medicine residents can be significantly improved with an inexpensive chest tube simulator and a brief workshop. The four-point checklist served as a reliable and effective means for teaching and assessing chest tube securement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017394578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017394578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.02.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.02.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 28408233
AN - SCOPUS:85017394578
SN - 0736-4679
VL - 53
SP - 110
EP - 115
JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 1
ER -