Security Consolidation in the Aftermath of Civil War: Explaining the Fates of Victorious Militias

Brandon Bolte, Minnie M. Joo, Bumba Mukherjee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Policymakers and peacebuilding research often focus on rebel groups when studying demobilization and integration processes, but post-war governments must also manage the non-state militias that helped them gain or maintain power. Why do some post-war governments disintegrate their militia allies, while others integrate them into the military? We argue that when a salient ethnic difference exists between the (new) ruling elite and an allied militia, a process of mutual uncertainty in the post-war period will incentivize governments to disintegrate the group. However, governments will be most likely to integrate their militias when the military has sufficient coercive capabilities but few organizational hindrances to re-organizing. Using new data on the post-war fates of victorious militias across all civil conflicts from 1989 to 2014, we find robust support for these claims. The results suggest that a government’s optimal militia management strategy is shaped by both social and organizational constraints during the post-war period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1459-1488
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Issue number9
StatePublished - Oct 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'Security Consolidation in the Aftermath of Civil War: Explaining the Fates of Victorious Militias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this