TY - JOUR
T1 - Segregation by District Boundary Line
T2 - The Fragmentation of Memphis Area Schools
AU - Frankenberg, Erica
AU - Siegel-Hawley, Genevieve
AU - Diem, Sarah
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by a grant award from the Virginia Commonwealth University Presidential Research Quest Fund, Grant/ Award Number 295057. 1In 2012–2013, Tennessee State Department of Education data suppressed student counts when a group in a school was less than 10 students, which may have some small effect on the segregation calculations reported. 2We selected H instead of the dissimilarity index because it allowed us to examine all racial groups at once. The dissimilarity index only permits pair-wise racial group comparison. H also allowed us to explore the impact of fragmentation since it can be broken out into within-district and between-district segregation components. One drawback to H, however, is that segregation may appear low due to desegregation of two historically marginalized groups like Black and Latino students into the same schools (information that would be more apparent from the exposure index).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 AERA.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Boundary lines have long served as a mechanism to divide people, determining the quality of available resources, and ultimately, educational opportunity. In recent years, new school district boundaries have proliferated as local communities attempt to secede from larger school districts. In this study of Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee, we extend prior research on school district fragmentation and consolidation by examining the largest American school district merger—and swift, subsequent suburban secessions—in recent decades. In Memphis, policy and political actors fostered decentralization and competition through the expansion of choices among new school districts defined by highly salient racial boundaries. These actions exacerbated segregation between districts with students’ racial and economic school-level exposure differing substantially across the new district lines. State and local actions that fostered the fragmentation of the consolidated district reduced possibilities for further integration and equity, with significant implications for students, families, and the larger community.
AB - Boundary lines have long served as a mechanism to divide people, determining the quality of available resources, and ultimately, educational opportunity. In recent years, new school district boundaries have proliferated as local communities attempt to secede from larger school districts. In this study of Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee, we extend prior research on school district fragmentation and consolidation by examining the largest American school district merger—and swift, subsequent suburban secessions—in recent decades. In Memphis, policy and political actors fostered decentralization and competition through the expansion of choices among new school districts defined by highly salient racial boundaries. These actions exacerbated segregation between districts with students’ racial and economic school-level exposure differing substantially across the new district lines. State and local actions that fostered the fragmentation of the consolidated district reduced possibilities for further integration and equity, with significant implications for students, families, and the larger community.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034617229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034617229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3102/0013189X17732752
DO - 10.3102/0013189X17732752
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85034617229
SN - 0013-189X
VL - 46
SP - 449
EP - 463
JO - Educational Researcher
JF - Educational Researcher
IS - 8
ER -