TY - JOUR
T1 - Selecting post-acute care settings after abdominal surgery
T2 - Are we getting it right?
AU - Balentine, Courtney J.
AU - Leverson, Glen
AU - Vanness, David J.
AU - Knight, Sara
AU - Turan, Janet
AU - Brown, Cynthia J.
AU - Chen, Herb
AU - Bhatia, Smita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Background: We investigated whether variation in post-acute care (PAC) services could be explained by surgeons discharging clinically similar patients to different PAC destinations, including home health (HH), skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and inpatient rehabilitation (IR). Methods: We studied patients having colectomy, pancreatectomy or hepatectomy in the 2008–2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We used propensity matching to determine: 1. Proportion of patients discharged to SNF/IR who could be matched to clinically similar patients discharged with HH. 2. Potential cost savings from greater use of HH. Results: 30,843 patients were discharged with HH and 23,172 to SNF or IR. 14,163 (61%) SNF/IR patients could be matched to similar patients discharged with HH. Potential cost savings from increasing use of HH as an alternative to SNF/IR ranged from $2.5-$438 million annually. Conclusions: There is considerable potential for reducing variation in PAC use and costs by better understanding how surgeons make decisions about PAC placement.
AB - Background: We investigated whether variation in post-acute care (PAC) services could be explained by surgeons discharging clinically similar patients to different PAC destinations, including home health (HH), skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and inpatient rehabilitation (IR). Methods: We studied patients having colectomy, pancreatectomy or hepatectomy in the 2008–2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We used propensity matching to determine: 1. Proportion of patients discharged to SNF/IR who could be matched to clinically similar patients discharged with HH. 2. Potential cost savings from greater use of HH. Results: 30,843 patients were discharged with HH and 23,172 to SNF or IR. 14,163 (61%) SNF/IR patients could be matched to similar patients discharged with HH. Potential cost savings from increasing use of HH as an alternative to SNF/IR ranged from $2.5-$438 million annually. Conclusions: There is considerable potential for reducing variation in PAC use and costs by better understanding how surgeons make decisions about PAC placement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029767329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029767329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.043
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 28951065
AN - SCOPUS:85029767329
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 216
SP - 260
EP - 266
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 2
ER -