TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensitivity of petrolatum and aqueous vehicles for detecting allergy to imidazolidinylurea, diazolidinylurea, and DMDM hydantoin
T2 - A retrospective analysis from the North American contact dermatitis group
AU - Rietschel, Robert L.
AU - Warshaw, Erin M.
AU - Sasseville, Denis
AU - Fowler, Joseph F.
AU - DeLeo, Vincent A.
AU - Belsito, Donald V.
AU - Taylor, James S.
AU - Storrs, Frances J.
AU - Mathias, C. G.Toby
AU - Maibach, Howard I.
AU - Marks, James G.
AU - Zug, Kathryn A.
AU - Pratt, Melanie
PY - 2007/9
Y1 - 2007/9
N2 - Objective: To determine whether petrolatum or aqueous vehicles are more sensitive for detecting allergy to imidazolidinylurea (IU), diazolidinylurea (DU), and dimethylol dimethyl hydantoin (DM). The relationship of these allergens to formaldehyde sensitivity was also explored. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients patch-tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. All patients were simultaneously tested to seven allergens (formaldehyde, IU in petrolatum [pet], IU aqueous [aq], DU pet, DU aq, DM pet, and DM aq). Data were analyzed in pairs with various "gold standard" definitions of "true allergy" and adjusting for correlated data. Results: Reaction to at least one of the seven allergens occurred in 2,398 patients. In all cases except one (which just approached statistical significance), the petrolatum-based allergen was statistically significantly more sensitive than the same allergen in an aqueous base. Most of the patients allergic to the three preservatives were also allergic to formaldehyde, but most formaldehyde- allergic patients were not allergic to the IU, DU, or DM. Conclusion: Of these two vehicles, petrolatum is significantly more sensitive than an aqueous vehicle is for detecting allergy to IU, DU, and DM.
AB - Objective: To determine whether petrolatum or aqueous vehicles are more sensitive for detecting allergy to imidazolidinylurea (IU), diazolidinylurea (DU), and dimethylol dimethyl hydantoin (DM). The relationship of these allergens to formaldehyde sensitivity was also explored. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients patch-tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. All patients were simultaneously tested to seven allergens (formaldehyde, IU in petrolatum [pet], IU aqueous [aq], DU pet, DU aq, DM pet, and DM aq). Data were analyzed in pairs with various "gold standard" definitions of "true allergy" and adjusting for correlated data. Results: Reaction to at least one of the seven allergens occurred in 2,398 patients. In all cases except one (which just approached statistical significance), the petrolatum-based allergen was statistically significantly more sensitive than the same allergen in an aqueous base. Most of the patients allergic to the three preservatives were also allergic to formaldehyde, but most formaldehyde- allergic patients were not allergic to the IU, DU, or DM. Conclusion: Of these two vehicles, petrolatum is significantly more sensitive than an aqueous vehicle is for detecting allergy to IU, DU, and DM.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348915913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348915913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2310/6620.2007.06040
DO - 10.2310/6620.2007.06040
M3 - Article
C2 - 17725923
AN - SCOPUS:35348915913
SN - 1710-3568
VL - 18
SP - 155
EP - 162
JO - Dermatitis
JF - Dermatitis
IS - 3
ER -