Serious Falls in Middle-Aged Veterans: Development and Validation of a Predictive Risk Model

Julie A. Womack, Terrence E. Murphy, Harini Bathulapalli, Alexandria Smith, Jonathan Bates, Samah Jarad, Nancy S. Redeker, Stephen L. Luther, Thomas M. Gill, Cynthia A. Brandt, Amy C. Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Due to high rates of multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and hazardous alcohol and opioid use, middle-aged Veterans are at risk for serious falls (those prompting a visit with a healthcare provider), posing significant risk to their forthcoming geriatric health and quality of life. We developed and validated a predictive model of the 6-month risk of serious falls among middle-aged Veterans. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Veterans Health Administration (VA). PARTICIPANTS: Veterans, aged 45 to 65 years, who presented for care within the VA between 2012 and 2015 (N = 275,940). EXPOSURES: The exposures of primary interest were substance use (including alcohol and prescription opioid use), multimorbidity, and polypharmacy. Hazardous alcohol use was defined as an Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Consumption (AUDIT-C) score of 3 or greater for women and 4 or greater for men. We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), codes to identify alcohol and illicit substance use disorders and identified prescription opioid use from pharmacy fill-refill data. We included counts of chronic medications and of physical and mental health comorbidities. MEASUREMENTS: We identified serious falls using external cause of injury codes and a machine-learning algorithm that identified serious falls in radiology reports. We used multivariable logistic regression with general estimating equations to calculate risk. We used an integrated predictiveness curve to identify intervention thresholds. RESULTS: Most of our sample (54%) was aged 60 years or younger. Duration of follow-up was up to 4 years. Veterans who fell were more likely to be female (11% vs 7%) and White (72% vs 68%). They experienced 43,641 serious falls during follow-up. We identified 16 key predictors of serious falls and five interaction terms. Model performance was enhanced by addition of opioid use, as evidenced by overall category-free net reclassification improvement of 0.32 (P <.001). Discrimination (C-statistic = 0.76) and calibration were excellent for both development and validation data sets. CONCLUSION: We developed and internally validated a model to predict 6-month risk of serious falls among middle-aged Veterans with excellent discrimination and calibration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2847-2854
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume68
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Serious Falls in Middle-Aged Veterans: Development and Validation of a Predictive Risk Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this