TY - JOUR
T1 - Serological Assays Reveal No Evidence of Natural SARS-CoV-2 Infection in US Cattle
AU - Ramasamy, Santhamani
AU - Quraishi, Meysoon
AU - Mukherjee, Swastidipa
AU - Mahajan, Sonalika
AU - LaBella, Lindsey C.
AU - Chothe, Shubhada K.
AU - Jakka, Padmaja
AU - Gontu, Abhinay
AU - Misra, Sougat
AU - Surendran-Nair, Meera
AU - Nissly, Ruth H.
AU - Kuchipudi, Suresh Varma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to pose a significant threat to public health. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 demonstrates the capacity to infect various non-human animal species, including both captive and free-living animals. Earlier experimental studies revealed low susceptibility of domestic cattle (Bos taurus) to ancestral B.1 lineage; however, recent experimental findings indicate greater permissiveness of cattle to SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. While some studies detected evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cattle in Italy, Germany, India, and Nigeria, currently, there is no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in US cattle. We have investigated over 600 samples, including pre-pandemic and pandemic cattle sera collected from Pennsylvania for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Since serological tests have inherent problems of false positives and negatives, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of multiple serological assays. As there are no known SARS-CoV-2 positive cattle serum samples, we used hyperimmune serum raised in cattle with SARS-CoV-2-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) as positive control for the test validation. We found that pseudovirus neutralization assays with a luciferase reporter system can produce false positive results, and care must be taken to interpret serological diagnosis using these assays. We found no serological evidence of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission among cattle in the US. This study underscores the importance of robust evaluation when employing serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection in cattle populations.
AB - Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to pose a significant threat to public health. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 demonstrates the capacity to infect various non-human animal species, including both captive and free-living animals. Earlier experimental studies revealed low susceptibility of domestic cattle (Bos taurus) to ancestral B.1 lineage; however, recent experimental findings indicate greater permissiveness of cattle to SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. While some studies detected evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cattle in Italy, Germany, India, and Nigeria, currently, there is no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in US cattle. We have investigated over 600 samples, including pre-pandemic and pandemic cattle sera collected from Pennsylvania for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Since serological tests have inherent problems of false positives and negatives, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of multiple serological assays. As there are no known SARS-CoV-2 positive cattle serum samples, we used hyperimmune serum raised in cattle with SARS-CoV-2-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) as positive control for the test validation. We found that pseudovirus neutralization assays with a luciferase reporter system can produce false positive results, and care must be taken to interpret serological diagnosis using these assays. We found no serological evidence of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission among cattle in the US. This study underscores the importance of robust evaluation when employing serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection in cattle populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001170004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001170004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/microorganisms13030600
DO - 10.3390/microorganisms13030600
M3 - Article
C2 - 40142493
AN - SCOPUS:105001170004
SN - 2076-2607
VL - 13
JO - Microorganisms
JF - Microorganisms
IS - 3
M1 - 600
ER -