TY - JOUR
T1 - Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic cystic neoplasms
T2 - A meta-Analysis
AU - Cao, Shaobo
AU - Hu, Ya
AU - Gao, Xiang
AU - Liao, Quan
AU - Zhao, Yupei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Cao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2016/11
Y1 - 2016/11
N2 - Background Using serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in discriminating between benign and malignant pancreatic disease remains controversial. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum CA 19-9 in predicting malignant pancreatic cystic lesions. Methods Eligible studies were identified through searching MEDLINE and EMBASE prior to March 2016. Studies were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy, 2nd version (QUADAS-2). Pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confi-dence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under curve (AUC) were performed. Results A total of thirteen studies including 1437 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.47(95% CI: 0.35-0.59), and 0.88(95% CI: 0.86-0.91), respectively, and the AUC was 0.87(95% CI, 0.84-0.90). Meta-regression analysis showed that sample size, region and reference standards were not the main sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions Serum CA 19-9 has satisfying pooled specificity while poor pooled sensitivity for discriminating benign from malignant PCNs. It deserves to be widely used as complementary to other clinical diagnostic methods.
AB - Background Using serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in discriminating between benign and malignant pancreatic disease remains controversial. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum CA 19-9 in predicting malignant pancreatic cystic lesions. Methods Eligible studies were identified through searching MEDLINE and EMBASE prior to March 2016. Studies were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy, 2nd version (QUADAS-2). Pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confi-dence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under curve (AUC) were performed. Results A total of thirteen studies including 1437 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.47(95% CI: 0.35-0.59), and 0.88(95% CI: 0.86-0.91), respectively, and the AUC was 0.87(95% CI, 0.84-0.90). Meta-regression analysis showed that sample size, region and reference standards were not the main sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions Serum CA 19-9 has satisfying pooled specificity while poor pooled sensitivity for discriminating benign from malignant PCNs. It deserves to be widely used as complementary to other clinical diagnostic methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994693962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994693962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0166406
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0166406
M3 - Article
C2 - 27835676
AN - SCOPUS:84994693962
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 11
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 11
M1 - e0166406
ER -