TY - JOUR
T1 - Should we give up after solyndra? Optimal technology R&D portfolios under uncertainty
AU - Webster, Mort
AU - Fisher-Vanden, Karen
AU - Popp, David
AU - Santen, Nidhi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Climate change and other environmental challenges require the development of new energy technologies with lower emissions. In the near term, R&D investments, either by the government or the private sector, can reduce the costs of these lower-emitting technologies. However, the returns to R&D are uncertain, and there are many potential technologies that may emerge to play an important role in the future energy mix. In this paper, we address the problem of allocating scarce R&D resources across technologies when uncertainties exist. We develop a multistage stochastic dynamic programming version of an integrated assessment model of the climate and economy that represents endogenous technological change through R&D decisions for two substitutable noncarbon backstop technologies. We demonstrate that near-term R&D investment in the higher cost technology is justified and that the optimal R&D investment in the higher cost technology increases with both higher variance and higher skewness in the distribution of returns to R&D.
AB - Climate change and other environmental challenges require the development of new energy technologies with lower emissions. In the near term, R&D investments, either by the government or the private sector, can reduce the costs of these lower-emitting technologies. However, the returns to R&D are uncertain, and there are many potential technologies that may emerge to play an important role in the future energy mix. In this paper, we address the problem of allocating scarce R&D resources across technologies when uncertainties exist. We develop a multistage stochastic dynamic programming version of an integrated assessment model of the climate and economy that represents endogenous technological change through R&D decisions for two substitutable noncarbon backstop technologies. We demonstrate that near-term R&D investment in the higher cost technology is justified and that the optimal R&D investment in the higher cost technology increases with both higher variance and higher skewness in the distribution of returns to R&D.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059635274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059635274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/691995
DO - 10.1086/691995
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85059635274
SN - 2333-5955
VL - 4
SP - S123-S151
JO - Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
JF - Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
IS - S1
ER -