Simple vs. complex: Implications of lags in pollution delivery for efficient load allocation and design of water-quality trading programs

James Shortle, David Abler, Zach Kaufman, Katherine Y. Zipp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Water-quality markets that allow point-nonpoint trades assume that nonpoint best management practices (BMPs) achieve the targeted reductions as soon as they are implemented. However, changes in water quality in response to BMPs occur over time-from a few months to decades. We simulate emission allocations using static and dynamic-optimization models to determine whether a simple static allocation can produce results comparable economically and environmentally to complex multi-period designs for nitrogen emissions to Chesapeake Bay. We find that static rules provide relatively large cost savings compared to dynamic rules but result in a delay in achievement of water-quality targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-393
Number of pages27
JournalAgricultural and Resource Economics Review
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simple vs. complex: Implications of lags in pollution delivery for efficient load allocation and design of water-quality trading programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this