Since surgery isn't getting any easier, why is reimbursement going down? An update from the SGO taskforce on coding and reimbursement

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In 2015, there was an 18% reduction in the Relative Value Units (RVUs) that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) assigned to the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 58571 (Laparoscopy, surgical, with total hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s) → TLH + BSO). The other CPT codes for laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (58541–58544 and 58570–58573) lost between 12 and 23% of their assigned RVUs. In 2016, the laparoscopic lymph node dissection codes 38570 (Laparoscopy, surgical; with retroperitoneal lymph node sampling (biopsy), single or multiple), 38571 (Laparoscopy, surgical; with bilateral total pelvic lymphadenectomy), and 38572 (Laparoscopy, surgical; with bilateral total pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymph node sampling (biopsy), single or multiple) lost between 5.5 and 16.3% of their RVU's. The goals of this article from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Task force on Coding and Reimbursement are 1) to inform the SGO members on why CMS identified these codes as a part of their misvalued services screening program and then finalized a reduction in their payment levels; and 2) outline the role individual providers have in CMS' methodology used to determine the reimbursement of a surgical procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-237
Number of pages3
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume144
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Since surgery isn't getting any easier, why is reimbursement going down? An update from the SGO taskforce on coding and reimbursement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this