Single or double degenerate progenitors? Searching for shock emission in the SDSS-II Type Ia supernovae

  • Brian T. Hayden
  • , Peter M. Garnavich
  • , Daniel Kasen
  • , Benjamin Dilday
  • , Joshua A. Frieman
  • , Saurabh W. Jha
  • , Hubert Lampeitl
  • , Robert C. Nichol
  • , Masao Sako
  • , Donald P. Schneider
  • , Mathew Smith
  • , Jesper Sollerman
  • , J. Craig Wheeler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

88 Scopus citations

Abstract

From the set of nearly 500 spectroscopically confirmed Type Ia supernovae (SNe) and around 10,000 unconfirmed candidates from SDSS-II, we select a subset of 108 confirmed SNe Ia with well-observed early-time light curves to search for signatures from shock interaction of the SN with a companion star. No evidence for shock emission is seen; however, the cadence and photometric noise could hide a weak shock signal. We simulate shocked light curves using SN Ia templates and a simple Gaussian shock model to emulate the noise properties of the SDSS-II sample and estimate the detectability of the shock interaction signal as a function of shock amplitude, shock width, and shock fraction. We find no direct evidence for shock interaction in the rest-frame B-band, but place an upper limit on the shock amplitude at 9% of SN peak flux (Mb >-16.6 mag). If the single degenerate channel dominates type Ia progenitors, this result constrains the companion stars to be less than about 6 M on the main sequence and strongly disfavors red giant companions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1691-1698
Number of pages8
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume722
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 20 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Single or double degenerate progenitors? Searching for shock emission in the SDSS-II Type Ia supernovae'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this