TY - JOUR
T1 - Size-assortative mating in explosive breeders
T2 - A case study of adaptive Male mate choice in anurans
AU - Swierk, Lindsey
AU - Langkilde, Tracy
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank N. Freidenfelds for advice and field assistance, J. Newman, J. Williams and J. Langshaw for field assistance, and the Hildebrand family for their support and enthusiasm. This work was supported by the Animal Behavior Society (Student Research Award to L.S.), the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (Grant-in-Herpetology to L.S.) and the National Science Foundation (grant number DGE-1255832 to L.S.; any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation). All procedures adhered to national and international standards on animal welfare and were compliant with the legal requirements of the USA, the US National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the Institutional Guidelines of Penn State University (IACUC Nos 42015 and 33346). Animal collection was permitted by the Pennsylvania Game Commission (NC-028-2012) and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (Scientific Collector’s Permit 483 Type 1).
Funding Information:
We thank N. Freidenfelds for advice and field assistance, J. Newman, J. Williams and J. Langshaw for field assistance, and the Hildebrand family for their support and enthusiasm. This work was supported by the Animal Behavior Society (Student Research Award to L.S.), the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (Grant-in-Herpetology to L.S.) and the National Science Foundation (grant number DGE-1255832 to L.S.; any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation). All procedures adhered to national and international standards on animal welfare and were compliant with the legal requirements of the USA, the US National Research Council?s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the Institutional Guidelines of Penn State University (IACUC Nos 42015 and 33346). Animal collection was permitted by the Pennsylvania Game Commission (NC-028-2012) and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (Scientific Collector?s Permit 483 Type 1).
Publisher Copyright:
© KONINKLIJKE BRILL NV, LEIDEN, 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Exploration of size-assortative mating (SAM) in animals has led to a near consensus that it arises through constraints in choice, such as preference for large females combined with a large male advantage during intrasexual competition. Although such ‘apparent’ SAM is well explored, whether SAM arises because of specific preferences for size-matched mates has been less thoroughly considered. We tested for ‘preference-based’ SAM in an explosively breeding frog (Rana sylvatica), quantifying how male and female sizes affected fertilization and if males preferred size-matched females. We found that size mismatch severely reduced fertilization. Furthermore, males preferred size-matched, not larger, females in mate choice trials. Because males that mated with much larger females fertilized fewer eggs overall than they would have with size-matched females, male preference for size-matched females may be adaptive. Our results expand understanding of the mechanisms underlying SAM, suggesting that multiple mechanisms may simultaneously cause size-assortative mating patterns to emerge.
AB - Exploration of size-assortative mating (SAM) in animals has led to a near consensus that it arises through constraints in choice, such as preference for large females combined with a large male advantage during intrasexual competition. Although such ‘apparent’ SAM is well explored, whether SAM arises because of specific preferences for size-matched mates has been less thoroughly considered. We tested for ‘preference-based’ SAM in an explosively breeding frog (Rana sylvatica), quantifying how male and female sizes affected fertilization and if males preferred size-matched females. We found that size mismatch severely reduced fertilization. Furthermore, males preferred size-matched, not larger, females in mate choice trials. Because males that mated with much larger females fertilized fewer eggs overall than they would have with size-matched females, male preference for size-matched females may be adaptive. Our results expand understanding of the mechanisms underlying SAM, suggesting that multiple mechanisms may simultaneously cause size-assortative mating patterns to emerge.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112475433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112475433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/1568539X-bja10098
DO - 10.1163/1568539X-bja10098
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85112475433
SN - 0005-7959
VL - 158
SP - 849
EP - 868
JO - Behaviour
JF - Behaviour
IS - 10
ER -