TY - JOUR
T1 - Small molecule drugs for atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hereditary angioedema
AU - Geng, Bob
AU - Craig, Timothy J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Editorial and writing support was provided by Natasha Daoud, MBChB, and Ashly Pavlovsky, PhD, from Porterhouse Medical Group. Disclosures: Dr Geng reports receiving speaker and consulting fees from BioCryst, CSL Behring, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda, and consulting fees from Pharming. Dr Craig reports receiving research funding from BioCryst, CSL Behring, GSK, Ionis, KalVista, Pharmaris, Regeneron, and Takeda; speaker fees from BioCryst, CSL Behring, Grifols, Sanofi, and Takeda; and consulting fees from BioCryst, BioMarin, CSL Behring, Fresenius Kabi, Pharming, Spark, and Takeda. Funding: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc provided funding for medical writing support and editorial assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Objective: To review recent trends in the development of targeted small molecule drugs (SMDs) for the treatment of immunologically driven disorders, including atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hereditary angioedema. Data sources: Data sources included peer-reviewed published literature from the PubMed database, published abstracts from scientific and medical meetings, and medication information from the Drugs@FDA database. Study selections: Articles with primary or retrospective trial results, articles with patient or physician survey results, articles providing expert perspectives, and commentary on chronic immunologic disorders, Food and Drug Administration package inserts, and abstracts from scientific meetings were selected. Results: Targeted biological therapies have greatly improved response rates and symptom relief for patients with long-term immunologically driven disorders over the past 2 decades. However, recent advances in the understanding of molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of these disorders have led to the development of novel targeted SMDs, such as tofacitinib and berotralstat, that can be delivered orally or topically. Few head-to-head studies that compare the safety and efficacy of biologics to SMDs in immunologically driven disorders exist, although some studies suggest that oral and topical modes of administration are preferred by patients and may improve patient quality of life over time. Conclusion: Scientific advances have led to an increase in the development of targeted SMDs for the treatment of chronic immunologic disorders, which may revolutionize the management of these diseases. Head-to-head studies and real-world evidence are needed to fully compare treatment attributes between biologics and SMDs, including safety, efficacy, adherence, impact on quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
AB - Objective: To review recent trends in the development of targeted small molecule drugs (SMDs) for the treatment of immunologically driven disorders, including atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hereditary angioedema. Data sources: Data sources included peer-reviewed published literature from the PubMed database, published abstracts from scientific and medical meetings, and medication information from the Drugs@FDA database. Study selections: Articles with primary or retrospective trial results, articles with patient or physician survey results, articles providing expert perspectives, and commentary on chronic immunologic disorders, Food and Drug Administration package inserts, and abstracts from scientific meetings were selected. Results: Targeted biological therapies have greatly improved response rates and symptom relief for patients with long-term immunologically driven disorders over the past 2 decades. However, recent advances in the understanding of molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of these disorders have led to the development of novel targeted SMDs, such as tofacitinib and berotralstat, that can be delivered orally or topically. Few head-to-head studies that compare the safety and efficacy of biologics to SMDs in immunologically driven disorders exist, although some studies suggest that oral and topical modes of administration are preferred by patients and may improve patient quality of life over time. Conclusion: Scientific advances have led to an increase in the development of targeted SMDs for the treatment of chronic immunologic disorders, which may revolutionize the management of these diseases. Head-to-head studies and real-world evidence are needed to fully compare treatment attributes between biologics and SMDs, including safety, efficacy, adherence, impact on quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119184417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119184417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.015
DO - 10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.015
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34673223
AN - SCOPUS:85119184417
SN - 1081-1206
VL - 128
SP - 263
EP - 268
JO - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
JF - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
IS - 3
ER -