Abstract
This study aims to address strategies, models, and the motivation behind smart cities by analyzing two smart city project cases in medium-sized cities, i.e., Gimpo and Namyangju in South Korea. The case of Smartopia Gimpo represents a top-down, infrastructure-focused smart city innovation that invested in building state-of-the-art big data infrastructure for crime prevention, traffic alleviation, environmental preservation, and disaster management. On the other hand, Namyangju 4.0 represents a strategy focused on internal process innovation through extensive employee training and education regarding smart city concepts and emphasizing data-driven (rather than infrastructure-driven) policy decision making. This study explores two smart city strategies and how they resulted in distinctively different outcomes. We found that instilling a culture of innovation through the training of government managers and frontline workers is a critical component in achieving a holistic and sustainable smart city transformation that can survive leadership changes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-53 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Smart Cities |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Urban Studies
- Artificial Intelligence
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Smart city strategies—Technology push or culture pull? A case study exploration of gimpo and Namyangju, South Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver