TY - JOUR
T1 - Social and genetic influences on adolescent religious attitudes and practices
AU - Eaves, Lindon J.
AU - Hatemi, Peter K.
AU - Prom-Womley, Elizabeth C.
AU - Murrelle, Lenn
N1 - Funding Information:
The ascertainment and assessment of the sample was supported by a grant from the John M. Templeton Foundation to the Medical College of Virginia Foundation. Data analysis was supported by MH062368 (PI Lindon Eaves). Peter Hatemi is supported in part by MH20030-09. Lindon Eaves and Peter Hatemi contributed equally to this article. Direct correspondence to Lindon J. Eaves, Departments of Human Genetics and Psychiatry, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980003, Biotech 1-156, Richmond, VA 23298-0126. Phone: 804-828-8155. E-mail: [email protected].
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - The authors explore the contributions of social and genetic influences to religious attitudes and practices in a population-based sample of 11-18 year olds and their mothers who responded to a Religious Attitudes and Practices Inventory and Religious Rearing Practices Inventory respectively. Contrary to genetic studies examining adult religious behavior, genetic influences were small, accounting for only 10 percent of the variance. Rather, the effects of the social environment were much larger, greater than 50 percent, and a majority of offspring similarity was explained by familial rearing. In light of the divergent finding between adolescents and adults, one supporting a socialization model and the other a genetic model, the importance of integrating genetic and social science methodology for complex social behaviors is discussed.
AB - The authors explore the contributions of social and genetic influences to religious attitudes and practices in a population-based sample of 11-18 year olds and their mothers who responded to a Religious Attitudes and Practices Inventory and Religious Rearing Practices Inventory respectively. Contrary to genetic studies examining adult religious behavior, genetic influences were small, accounting for only 10 percent of the variance. Rather, the effects of the social environment were much larger, greater than 50 percent, and a majority of offspring similarity was explained by familial rearing. In light of the divergent finding between adolescents and adults, one supporting a socialization model and the other a genetic model, the importance of integrating genetic and social science methodology for complex social behaviors is discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46449096670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46449096670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/sof.0.0050
DO - 10.1353/sof.0.0050
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:46449096670
SN - 0037-7732
VL - 86
SP - 1621
EP - 1646
JO - Social Forces
JF - Social Forces
IS - 4
ER -