TY - GEN
T1 - Social Choice Theory and Recommender Systems
T2 - 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAA1 2000
AU - Pennock, David M.
AU - Horvitz, Eric
AU - Lee Giles, C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Thanks to Jack Breese and to the anonymous reviewers for ideas, insights, and pointers to relevant work.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2000, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The growth of Internet commerce has stimulated the use of collaborative filtering (CF) algorithms as recommender systems. Such systems leverage knowledge about the behavior of multiple users to recommend items of interest to individual users. CF methods have been harnessed to make recommendations about such items as web pages, movies, books, and toys. Researchers have proposed several variations of the technology. We take the perspective of CF as a methodology for combining preferences. The preferences predicted for the end user is some function of all of the known preferences for everyone in a database. Social Choice theorists, concerned with the properties of voting methods, have been investigating preference aggregation for decades. At the heart of this body of work is Arrow's result demonstrating the impossibility of combining preferences in a way that satisfies several desirable and innocuous-looking properties. We show that researchers working on CF algorithms often make similar assumptions. We elucidate these assumptions and extend results from Social Choice theory to CF methods. We show that only very restrictive CF functions are consistent with desirable aggregation properties. Finally, we discuss practical implications of these results.
AB - The growth of Internet commerce has stimulated the use of collaborative filtering (CF) algorithms as recommender systems. Such systems leverage knowledge about the behavior of multiple users to recommend items of interest to individual users. CF methods have been harnessed to make recommendations about such items as web pages, movies, books, and toys. Researchers have proposed several variations of the technology. We take the perspective of CF as a methodology for combining preferences. The preferences predicted for the end user is some function of all of the known preferences for everyone in a database. Social Choice theorists, concerned with the properties of voting methods, have been investigating preference aggregation for decades. At the heart of this body of work is Arrow's result demonstrating the impossibility of combining preferences in a way that satisfies several desirable and innocuous-looking properties. We show that researchers working on CF algorithms often make similar assumptions. We elucidate these assumptions and extend results from Social Choice theory to CF methods. We show that only very restrictive CF functions are consistent with desirable aggregation properties. Finally, we discuss practical implications of these results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941678572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941678572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84941678572
T3 - Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2000
SP - 729
EP - 734
BT - Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12fth Conference on Innovative Applications ofArtificial Intelligence, AAAI 2000
PB - AAAI press
Y2 - 30 July 2000 through 3 August 2000
ER -