TY - JOUR
T1 - Social distance and texting while driving
T2 - A behavioral economic analysis of social discounting
AU - Foreman, Anne M.
AU - Hayashi, Yusuke
AU - Friedel, Jonathan E.
AU - Wirth, Oliver
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, The work of Anne M. Foreman, Jonathan E. Friedel, and Oliver Wirth was authored as part of their official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 USC. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under US Law. Yusuke Hayashi hereby waives their right to assert copyright, but not their right to be named as co-author in the article.
PY - 2019/10/3
Y1 - 2019/10/3
N2 - Objective: Texting while driving is a dangerous behavior. Drivers continue to engage in the behavior despite knowing its risks, and the factors responsible for the decision to text while driving are poorly understood. This study examined how the relationship of the sender to the driver, in addition to the delay to the destination, may affect the decision to text while driving with the use of a social- and delay-discounting paradigm. Methods: Ninety-four (N = 94) undergraduate students completed a hypothetical social- and delay-discounting task in which they rated their likelihood of replying to a text message immediately versus waiting to reply until arriving at a destination. The social distance of the sender and the delay to the destination were varied across trials. Results: For both social and delay discounting, the likelihood of replying and waiting, respectively, decreased as a function of social distance and delay to the destination. Participants were more likely to text while driving as the social distance of the sender decreased and the delay to the destination increased. Social discounting varied inversely as a function of delay to the destination: The shorter the delay to the destination, the greater the social discounting. Conclusion: The findings indicate that social distance of the sender is an important factor involved in the decision to text while driving. Participants were more likely to reply to a text while driving if the sender was less socially distant. When they were closer to their destination, they were less likely to reply to socially distant people than those closer to them. The roles that social consequences play in drivers’ decision making to text while driving are discussed.
AB - Objective: Texting while driving is a dangerous behavior. Drivers continue to engage in the behavior despite knowing its risks, and the factors responsible for the decision to text while driving are poorly understood. This study examined how the relationship of the sender to the driver, in addition to the delay to the destination, may affect the decision to text while driving with the use of a social- and delay-discounting paradigm. Methods: Ninety-four (N = 94) undergraduate students completed a hypothetical social- and delay-discounting task in which they rated their likelihood of replying to a text message immediately versus waiting to reply until arriving at a destination. The social distance of the sender and the delay to the destination were varied across trials. Results: For both social and delay discounting, the likelihood of replying and waiting, respectively, decreased as a function of social distance and delay to the destination. Participants were more likely to text while driving as the social distance of the sender decreased and the delay to the destination increased. Social discounting varied inversely as a function of delay to the destination: The shorter the delay to the destination, the greater the social discounting. Conclusion: The findings indicate that social distance of the sender is an important factor involved in the decision to text while driving. Participants were more likely to reply to a text while driving if the sender was less socially distant. When they were closer to their destination, they were less likely to reply to socially distant people than those closer to them. The roles that social consequences play in drivers’ decision making to text while driving are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070269187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070269187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15389588.2019.1636233
DO - 10.1080/15389588.2019.1636233
M3 - Article
C2 - 31356123
AN - SCOPUS:85070269187
SN - 1538-9588
VL - 20
SP - 702
EP - 707
JO - Traffic Injury Prevention
JF - Traffic Injury Prevention
IS - 7
ER -