Social Influence and Crime‐Victim Decision Making

R. Barry Ruback, Martin S. Greenberg, David R. Westcott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations


Other people can affect a crime‐victim's decision to notify the police in at least four different ways: (a) by cuing the victim to a particular “script” or particular actions within a script, (b) by providing arguments and advice, (c) by indicating what normative standards operate within some group important to the victim, and (d) by providing socioemotional support or nonsupport. These four functions others serve can operate when the victim is labeling an event as a crime, when the victim is determining its seriousness, and when the victim is deciding what to do about it. This paper discusses these four functions in terms of relevant theoretical and empirical work. 1984 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-76
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1984

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Social Influence and Crime‐Victim Decision Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this