Abstract
Research has shown positive attitudes toward journalists and their roles foster pro-democratic outcomes. With the rise of social media as news sources, algorithms operate as gatekeepers, which may alter linkages between public opinion, journalists, and media trust. However, results from a panel-survey conducted in the U.S. underline citizens’ preference for journalist gatekeeping in fueling trust in traditional and social media news. Conversely, preference for algorithmic news selection does not affect people’s levels of trust. Furthermore, traditional news use moderates this relationship as those who report higher traditional news use and a preference for professional news gatekeeping trust traditional news the most. This study contributes to current discussions on the effects of preference for journalists’ or algorithmic news selection, arguing that evaluations of journalists’ editorial work remain critical to explain media trust.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 755-778 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journalism |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Communication
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social media algorithmic versus professional journalists’ news selection: Effects of gate keeping on traditional and social media news trust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver