Abstract
During its 2013-2014 term, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of Proposal 2, a ballot measure that amended Michigan's state constitution to ban the consideration of race in admissions at public postsecondary institutions. This article outlines the legal questions that have emerged in the case-Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action et al.-and identifies areas where social science research can inform answers to these questions. This analysis should help enhance the relevance of research to legal determinations in cases that have broad implications for educators.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 591-614 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Educational Policy |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social Science Research and the Courts: Informing Post-Grutter v. Bollinger Developments in Higher Education Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver