Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research

  • Tatiana Chakravorti
  • , Xinyu Wang
  • , Pranav Narayanan Venkit
  • , Sai Koneru
  • , Kevin Munger
  • , Sarah Rajtmajer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into social science research practices raises significant technological, methodological, and ethical issues. We present a community-centric study drawing on 284 survey responses and 15 semi-structured interviews with social scientists, describing their familiarity with, perceptions of the usefulness of, and ethical concerns about the use of AI in their field. A crucial innovation in study design is to split our survey sample in half, providing the same questions to each - but randomizing whether participants were asked about”AI” or”Machine Learning” (ML). We find that the use of AI in research settings has increased significantly among social scientists in step with the widespread popularity of generative AI (genAI). These tools have been used for a range of tasks, from summarizing literature reviews to drafting research papers. Some respondents used these tools out of curiosity but were dissatisfied with the results, while others have now integrated them into their typical workflows. Participants, however, also reported concerns with the use of AI in research contexts. This is a departure from more traditional ML algorithms which they view as statistically grounded. Participants express greater trust in ML, citing its relative transparency compared to black-box genAI systems. Ethical concerns, particularly around automation bias, deskilling, research misconduct, complex interpretability, and representational harm, are raised in relation to genAI. We situate these findings within broader sociotechnical debates, arguing that responsible integration of AI in social science research requires more than technical solutions: it demands a rethinking of research values, human-centered design, and institutional support structures. To guide this transition, we offer recommendations for AI developers, researchers, educators, and policymakers focusing on explainability, transparency, ethical safeguards, sustainability, and the integration of lived experiences into AI design and evaluation processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 8th AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2025
EditorsEmanuelle Burton, Nicholas Mattei, Andres Paez
PublisherAAAI press
Pages528-540
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)157735902X, 9781577359029
StatePublished - 2025
Event8th AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2025 - Madrid, Spain
Duration: Oct 20 2025Oct 22 2025

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 8th AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2025

Conference

Conference8th AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2025
Country/TerritorySpain
CityMadrid
Period10/20/2510/22/25

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this