Abstract
This study addresses two important questions related to engineering of safety-critical software and software-intensive systems. The first question is: which software and software-intensive systems should be considered safety critical? The second question is: what processes, design practices, and tools have practitioners been using for building these systems? We answer these questions through an analysis of unstructured interviews with experienced engineers who self-describe as working on safety-critical systems. Then, a thematic analysis of these responses was conducted. The results of this study are intended to provide guidance to those building safety-critical systems and have implications on state engineering licensure boards, in the determination of legal liability, and in risk assessment for policymakers, corporate governors, and insurance executives.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 8006260 |
| Pages (from-to) | 825-836 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Reliability |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Software Engineering of Safety-Critical Systems: Themes from Practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver