TY - JOUR
T1 - Soil carbon sequestration in freshwater wetlands varies across a gradient of ecological condition and by ecoregion
AU - Fennessy, M. S.
AU - Wardrop, D. H.
AU - Moon, J. B.
AU - Wilson, S.
AU - Craft, C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Star Grant 83301301 . We would like to thank Hannah Ingram, Aliana Britson, Brett Dietz, Kyle Martin, Marla Korpar and Nicole Kircher for field and laboratory assistance. We would also like to thank Mike Nassry for initial hydrologic metric determinations. Publication was assisted by U.S. National Science Foundation grant number 1619948 with project title: U.S. Science International Collaborations and Contributions to EcoSummit 2016 ‘Sustainability: EngineeringChange'.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/4/15
Y1 - 2018/4/15
N2 - We evaluated the ability of freshwater riparian wetlands along a gradient of ecological condition to act as sinks for carbon and sediment. We compared rates of carbon accretion and soil accretion across 20 wetlands in the Lake Erie Drift Plain and the Ridge and Valley ecoregions. Soil cores were collected and analyzed using 137Cs dating to quantify long-term (∼50 year) rates of sediment and carbon accumulation. Data on hydrology and floristic quality were used to help explain variability in rates. Sites were classified as being in low, moderate, or high ecological condition based on a rapid assessment method, which was verified by their floristic quality. Wetlands of low ecological condition (more human disturbance) had higher mean soil accretion and carbon accretion rates. Soil accretion averaged 0.24 ± 0.17 cm yr−1 and 0.14 ± 0.04 cm yr−1 in low condition sites and high condition sites, respectively. Carbon accretion averaged 88 ± 50 gC m−2 yr−1 in low condition and 65 ± 27 gC m−2 yr−1 in high condition sites. Low condition sites had lower mean soil carbon concentrations in the upper 10 cm of the soil profile, suggesting that the higher carbon burial in these sites was related to allochthonous carbon inputs in incoming sediment, rather than autochthonous carbon inputs. There were also striking rate differences between ecoregions. Erie Drift Plain wetlands had significantly higher mean soil accretion rates, compared to Ridge and Valley wetlands. These data indicate that freshwater wetlands play a role in regulating climate by acting as carbon sinks and that anthropogenic disturbance can impact rates of carbon burial.
AB - We evaluated the ability of freshwater riparian wetlands along a gradient of ecological condition to act as sinks for carbon and sediment. We compared rates of carbon accretion and soil accretion across 20 wetlands in the Lake Erie Drift Plain and the Ridge and Valley ecoregions. Soil cores were collected and analyzed using 137Cs dating to quantify long-term (∼50 year) rates of sediment and carbon accumulation. Data on hydrology and floristic quality were used to help explain variability in rates. Sites were classified as being in low, moderate, or high ecological condition based on a rapid assessment method, which was verified by their floristic quality. Wetlands of low ecological condition (more human disturbance) had higher mean soil accretion and carbon accretion rates. Soil accretion averaged 0.24 ± 0.17 cm yr−1 and 0.14 ± 0.04 cm yr−1 in low condition sites and high condition sites, respectively. Carbon accretion averaged 88 ± 50 gC m−2 yr−1 in low condition and 65 ± 27 gC m−2 yr−1 in high condition sites. Low condition sites had lower mean soil carbon concentrations in the upper 10 cm of the soil profile, suggesting that the higher carbon burial in these sites was related to allochthonous carbon inputs in incoming sediment, rather than autochthonous carbon inputs. There were also striking rate differences between ecoregions. Erie Drift Plain wetlands had significantly higher mean soil accretion rates, compared to Ridge and Valley wetlands. These data indicate that freshwater wetlands play a role in regulating climate by acting as carbon sinks and that anthropogenic disturbance can impact rates of carbon burial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031111001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031111001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85031111001
SN - 0925-8574
VL - 114
SP - 129
EP - 136
JO - Ecological Engineering
JF - Ecological Engineering
ER -