Abstract
Male undergraduates high and low in self-monitoring listened to either an expert or attractive male source deliver a counterattitudinal message supported by either strong or weak arguments. As expected, high self-monitoring individuals agreed with the expert source regardless of the quality of the arguments presented but agreed with the attractive source only when he delivered strong arguments. By contrast, low self-monitoring individuals agreed with the attractive source regardless of the quality of the arguments presented but agreed with the expert source only when he delivered strong arguments. Cognitive response and recall data suggested that high-self monitoring individuals were systematically processing the attractive source's message and were heuristically processing the expert source's message, whereas low self-monitoring individuals were systematically processing the expert source's message and were heuristically processing the attractive source's message. We discuss the role of source variables in persuasion settings, the determinants of an information-processing strategy, and the functional underpinnings of attitudes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 541-546 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1988 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Source Expertise, Source Attractiveness, and the Processing of Persuasive Information: A Functional Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver