TY - JOUR
T1 - Source of methane and methods to control its formation in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells
AU - Wang, Aijie
AU - Liu, Wenzong
AU - Cheng, Shaoan
AU - Xing, Defeng
AU - Zhou, Jizhong
AU - Logan, Bruce E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Doug Call, Yi Zuo, Matthew Merrill and David Jones at Penn State for assistance with the experimental work. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 50678049 and No. 50878062), by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-2005), and the US National Science Foundation (CBET-0730359).
Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/5
Y1 - 2009/5
N2 - Methane production occurs during hydrogen gas generation in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs), particularly when single chamber systems are used which do not keep gases, generated at the cathode, separate from the anode. Few studies have examined the factors contributing to methane gas generation or the main pathway in MECs. It is shown here that methane generation is primarily associated with current generation and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and not substrate (acetate). Little methane gas was generated in the initial reaction time (<12 h) in a fed batch MEC when acetate concentrations were high. Most methane was produced at the end of a batch cycle when hydrogen and carbon dioxide gases were present at the greatest concentrations. Increasing the cycle time from 24 to 72 h resulted in complete consumption of hydrogen gas in the headspace (applied voltage of 0.7 V) with methane production. High applied voltages reduced methane production. Little methane (<4%) accumulated in the gas phase at an applied voltage of 0.6-0.9 V over a typical 24 h cycle. However, when the applied voltage was decreased to 0.4 V, there was a greater production of methane than hydrogen gas due to low current densities and long cycle times. The lack of significant hydrogen production from acetate was also supported by Coulombic efficiencies that were all around 90%, indicating electron flow was not altered by changes in methane production. These results demonstrate that methane production in single chamber MECs is primarily associated with current generation and hydrogen gas production, and not acetoclastic methanogenesis. Methane generation will therefore be difficult to control in mixed culture MECs that produce high concentrations of hydrogen gas. By keeping cycle times short, and using higher applied voltages (≥0.6 V), it is possible to reduce methane gas concentrations (<4%) but not eliminate methanogenesis in MECs.
AB - Methane production occurs during hydrogen gas generation in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs), particularly when single chamber systems are used which do not keep gases, generated at the cathode, separate from the anode. Few studies have examined the factors contributing to methane gas generation or the main pathway in MECs. It is shown here that methane generation is primarily associated with current generation and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and not substrate (acetate). Little methane gas was generated in the initial reaction time (<12 h) in a fed batch MEC when acetate concentrations were high. Most methane was produced at the end of a batch cycle when hydrogen and carbon dioxide gases were present at the greatest concentrations. Increasing the cycle time from 24 to 72 h resulted in complete consumption of hydrogen gas in the headspace (applied voltage of 0.7 V) with methane production. High applied voltages reduced methane production. Little methane (<4%) accumulated in the gas phase at an applied voltage of 0.6-0.9 V over a typical 24 h cycle. However, when the applied voltage was decreased to 0.4 V, there was a greater production of methane than hydrogen gas due to low current densities and long cycle times. The lack of significant hydrogen production from acetate was also supported by Coulombic efficiencies that were all around 90%, indicating electron flow was not altered by changes in methane production. These results demonstrate that methane production in single chamber MECs is primarily associated with current generation and hydrogen gas production, and not acetoclastic methanogenesis. Methane generation will therefore be difficult to control in mixed culture MECs that produce high concentrations of hydrogen gas. By keeping cycle times short, and using higher applied voltages (≥0.6 V), it is possible to reduce methane gas concentrations (<4%) but not eliminate methanogenesis in MECs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65649150423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65649150423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:65649150423
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 34
SP - 3653
EP - 3658
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IS - 9
ER -