Abstract
St. Petersburg, Russia, consists of a historical city from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries surrounded by vast socialist housing estates constructed after World War II. This article describes the city's planned pedestrian circulation systems, contrasting them with a second spatial system that the populace has throughout time superimposed on the "official" city and that may be mapped less in a physical than in a sociological sense. In this second city, steeped in communistic values, the threshold between what was once public and private has become redefined, so that the public now enters once-private spaces at will. This article compares the two structures of St. Petersburg and examines how they may be tied into theoretical frameworks of sociospatial mapping.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 334-354 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Urban History |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Sociology and Political Science
- Urban Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'St. Petersburg's double life: The planners' versus the people's city'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver