TY - JOUR
T1 - Stability of activity space footprint, size, and environmental features over six months
AU - Kraft, Amber N.
AU - Jones, Kelly K.
AU - Lin, Ting Ti
AU - Matthews, Stephen A.
AU - Zenk, Shannon N.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Shubhayan Ukil and Lukas Kucinski for research assistance, as well as Alexander Demos for his valuable suggestions to guide the statistical analysis. This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute (R21CA195543). Environmental data were provided through other National Cancer Institute support (R01CA172726). We thank the Active Living Research Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for the loan of some accelerometer equipment used in this study. The analysis in this paper was also supported in part through a collaboration with the PALMS Project (UCSD-Palms-Project.wikispaces.com) at the University of California, San Diego (U01CA130771). None.
Funding Information:
We thank Shubhayan Ukil and Lukas Kucinski for research assistance, as well as Alexander Demos for his valuable suggestions to guide the statistical analysis. This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute ( R21CA195543 ). Environmental data were provided through other National Cancer Institute support ( R01CA172726 ). We thank the Active Living Research Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for the loan of some accelerometer equipment used in this study. The analysis in this paper was also supported in part through a collaboration with the PALMS Project (UCSD-Palms-Project.wikispaces.com) at the University of California, San Diego ( U01CA130771 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - As activity space measures are increasingly used to estimate exposure to environmental determinants of health, little is known about the stability of these measures over time. To test the stability of GPS-derived measures of activity-space footprint, size, and environmental features over time, we compared 14-day measures at baseline and six months later for 35 adults in a large city. Activity-space measures were based on convex hulls and 500 m route buffers, and included the geographic footprint (i.e. location of the activity space), size (i.e., area in square miles; (Cummins, 2007)), and environmental features including supermarket, fast-food restaurant, and parkland density. The proportion of the participants’ smaller geographic footprint covered by the larger was, on average, 0.64 (SD 0.17) for the 500 m route buffer and 0.84 (SD 0.18) for the convex hull. Mean percent change in activity space size ranged from 36.3% (mean daily 500 m route buffer) to 221.3% (cumulative convex hull). Mean percent change in the density of environmental features ranged from 28.8 to 66.5%. Forty-one percent to 92.4% of the variance at one timepoint was predicted by environmental features measured within approximately six months. Activity-space size and environmental features were moderately to highly stable over six months, although there was considerable variation in stability between measures. Strategies for addressing measurement error in studies of activity space-health associations are discussed.
AB - As activity space measures are increasingly used to estimate exposure to environmental determinants of health, little is known about the stability of these measures over time. To test the stability of GPS-derived measures of activity-space footprint, size, and environmental features over time, we compared 14-day measures at baseline and six months later for 35 adults in a large city. Activity-space measures were based on convex hulls and 500 m route buffers, and included the geographic footprint (i.e. location of the activity space), size (i.e., area in square miles; (Cummins, 2007)), and environmental features including supermarket, fast-food restaurant, and parkland density. The proportion of the participants’ smaller geographic footprint covered by the larger was, on average, 0.64 (SD 0.17) for the 500 m route buffer and 0.84 (SD 0.18) for the convex hull. Mean percent change in activity space size ranged from 36.3% (mean daily 500 m route buffer) to 221.3% (cumulative convex hull). Mean percent change in the density of environmental features ranged from 28.8 to 66.5%. Forty-one percent to 92.4% of the variance at one timepoint was predicted by environmental features measured within approximately six months. Activity-space size and environmental features were moderately to highly stable over six months, although there was considerable variation in stability between measures. Strategies for addressing measurement error in studies of activity space-health associations are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069649361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069649361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.sste.2019.100287
DO - 10.1016/j.sste.2019.100287
M3 - Article
C2 - 31421800
AN - SCOPUS:85069649361
SN - 1877-5845
VL - 30
JO - Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
JF - Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
M1 - 100287
ER -