TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder engagement in water resource management
T2 - a systematic review of definitions, practices, and outcomes
AU - Whitley, Hannah
AU - Engle, Elyzabeth W.
AU - Brasier, Kathryn J.
AU - Eaton, Weston M.
AU - Burbach, Mark E.
AU - Fowler, Lara B.
AU - Bonilla Anariba, Sara
AU - Butzler, Emma
AU - Dixon, Kathryn
AU - Kumar Chaudhary, Anil
AU - Whitmer, Walt
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Newcastle University.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In the past three decades, a paradigm shift has elevated stakeholder engagement in natural resource governance, emphasizing collaborative approaches for effective decision-making. While academic literature increasingly endorses engagement methods, a gap persists in our knowledge of the methods and outcomes of such processes. To address this disparity, we systematically reviewed 261 peer-reviewed studies on stakeholder engagement in water resource management from 2000 to 2019. Analyses find that data-driven studies of engagement processes and outcomes from engagement processes are limited in the peer-reviewed literature. Our findings underscore the need for consistent vocabulary and theoretical frameworks and increased empirical evaluation to enhance our understanding of stakeholder engagement processes and outcomes in water resource management. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings and synthesizing the methods suggested by the general literature for creating more inclusive, replicable, and impactful engagement-related research and practice in the future.
AB - In the past three decades, a paradigm shift has elevated stakeholder engagement in natural resource governance, emphasizing collaborative approaches for effective decision-making. While academic literature increasingly endorses engagement methods, a gap persists in our knowledge of the methods and outcomes of such processes. To address this disparity, we systematically reviewed 261 peer-reviewed studies on stakeholder engagement in water resource management from 2000 to 2019. Analyses find that data-driven studies of engagement processes and outcomes from engagement processes are limited in the peer-reviewed literature. Our findings underscore the need for consistent vocabulary and theoretical frameworks and increased empirical evaluation to enhance our understanding of stakeholder engagement processes and outcomes in water resource management. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings and synthesizing the methods suggested by the general literature for creating more inclusive, replicable, and impactful engagement-related research and practice in the future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188344530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188344530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2024.2323611
DO - 10.1080/09640568.2024.2323611
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85188344530
SN - 0964-0568
JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
ER -