State sponsors of terrorism disclosure and SEC financial reporting oversight

Robert Hills, Matthew Kubic, William J. Mayew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


We examine whether SEC effort to review state sponsors of terrorism (SST) disclosure negatively influences financial reporting oversight. Using comment letter inquiries about SST to measure effort, we find the likelihood that the SEC fails to identify a financial reporting error increases when comment letters reference SST. Consistent with SST disclosure review crowding out financial reporting oversight, comment letters referencing SST are less likely to mention accounting, non-GAAP, and MD&A issues. These effects are unique to SST as we find comment letter references to non-SST issues complement financial reporting oversight. Data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request reveals a temporal shift in the occupational mix of SEC reviewers towards (away from) lawyers (accountants) that coincides with an increased focus on SST. Path analysis reveals that accountants (lawyers) are more (less) likely to detect errors and comment on financial reporting topics, with an indirect path through SST exacerbating these effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101407
JournalJournal of Accounting and Economics
Issue number1
StatePublished - Aug 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'State sponsors of terrorism disclosure and SEC financial reporting oversight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this