TY - JOUR
T1 - Stellar Half-mass Radii of 0.5 z < 2.3 Galaxies
T2 - Comparison with JWST/NIRCam Half-light Radii
AU - van der Wel, Arjen
AU - Martorano, Marco
AU - Häußler, Boris
AU - Nedkova, Kalina V.
AU - Miller, Tim B.
AU - Brammer, Gabriel B.
AU - van de Ven, Glenn
AU - Leja, Joel
AU - Bezanson, Rachel S.
AU - Muzzin, Adam
AU - Marchesini, Danilo
AU - de Graaff, Anna
AU - Nelson, Erica J.
AU - Kriek, Mariska
AU - Bell, Eric F.
AU - Franx, Marijn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - We use CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging to measure rest-frame near-IR light profiles of 435 M ⋆ > 1010 M ⊙ galaxies in the redshift range of 0.5 < z < 2.3. We compare the resulting rest-frame 1.5-2 μm half-light radii (R NIR) with stellar half-mass radii ( R M ⋆ ) derived with multicolor light profiles from CANDELS Hubble Space Telescope imaging. In general agreement with previous work, we find that R NIR and R M ⋆ are up to 40% smaller than the rest-frame optical half-light radius R opt. The agreement between R NIR and R M ⋆ is excellent, with a negligible systematic offset (<0.03 dex) up to z = 2 for quiescent galaxies and up to z = 1.5 for star-forming galaxies. We also deproject the profiles to estimate R M ⋆ , 3 D , the radius of a sphere containing 50% of the stellar mass. We present the R−M ⋆ distribution of galaxies at 0.5 < z < 1.5, comparing R opt, R M ⋆ , and R M ⋆ , 3 D . The slope is significantly flatter for R M ⋆ and R M ⋆ , 3 D compared to R opt, mostly due to downward shifts in size for massive star-forming galaxies, while R M ⋆ and R M ⋆ , 3 D do not show markedly different trends. Finally, we show rapid evolution of the size (R ∝ (1 + z)−1.7±0.1) of massive (M ⋆ > 1011 M ⊙) quiescent galaxies between z = 0.5 and z = 2.3, again comparing R opt, R M ⋆ , and R M ⋆ , 3 D . We conclude that the main tenets of the evolution of the size narrative established over the past 20 yr, based on rest-frame optical light profile analysis, still hold in the era of JWST/NIRCam observations in the rest-frame near-IR.
AB - We use CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging to measure rest-frame near-IR light profiles of 435 M ⋆ > 1010 M ⊙ galaxies in the redshift range of 0.5 < z < 2.3. We compare the resulting rest-frame 1.5-2 μm half-light radii (R NIR) with stellar half-mass radii ( R M ⋆ ) derived with multicolor light profiles from CANDELS Hubble Space Telescope imaging. In general agreement with previous work, we find that R NIR and R M ⋆ are up to 40% smaller than the rest-frame optical half-light radius R opt. The agreement between R NIR and R M ⋆ is excellent, with a negligible systematic offset (<0.03 dex) up to z = 2 for quiescent galaxies and up to z = 1.5 for star-forming galaxies. We also deproject the profiles to estimate R M ⋆ , 3 D , the radius of a sphere containing 50% of the stellar mass. We present the R−M ⋆ distribution of galaxies at 0.5 < z < 1.5, comparing R opt, R M ⋆ , and R M ⋆ , 3 D . The slope is significantly flatter for R M ⋆ and R M ⋆ , 3 D compared to R opt, mostly due to downward shifts in size for massive star-forming galaxies, while R M ⋆ and R M ⋆ , 3 D do not show markedly different trends. Finally, we show rapid evolution of the size (R ∝ (1 + z)−1.7±0.1) of massive (M ⋆ > 1011 M ⊙) quiescent galaxies between z = 0.5 and z = 2.3, again comparing R opt, R M ⋆ , and R M ⋆ , 3 D . We conclude that the main tenets of the evolution of the size narrative established over the past 20 yr, based on rest-frame optical light profile analysis, still hold in the era of JWST/NIRCam observations in the rest-frame near-IR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180575951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85180575951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ad02ee
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ad02ee
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85180575951
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 960
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 53
ER -