Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Versus without Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

  • Ching Jen Chen
  • , Dale Ding
  • , Cheng Chia Lee
  • , Kathryn N. Kearns
  • , I. Jonathan Pomeraniec
  • , Christopher P. Cifarelli
  • , David E. Arsanious
  • , Roman Liscak
  • , Jaromir Hanuska
  • , Brian J. Williams
  • , Mehran B. Yusuf
  • , Shiao Y. Woo
  • , Natasha Ironside
  • , Ronald E. Warnick
  • , Daniel M. Trifiletti
  • , David Mathieu
  • , Monica Mureb
  • , Carolina Benjamin
  • , Douglas Kondziolka
  • , Caleb E. Feliciano
  • Rafael Rodriguez-Mercado, Kevin M. Cockroft, Scott Simon, Heath B. Mackley, Samer Zammar, Neel T. Patel, Varun Padmanaban, Nathan Beatson, Anissa Saylany, John Lee, Jason P. Sheehan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior comparisons of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without embolization were inherently flawed, due to differences in the pretreatment nidus volumes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of embolization and SRS, vs SRS alone for AVMs using pre-embolization malformation features. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018. Patients were categorized into the embolization and SRS (E + SRS) or SRS alone (SRS-only) cohorts. The 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores. Primary outcome was defined as AVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiologic and symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC), and cyst formation. RESULTS: The matched cohorts each comprised 101 patients. Crude AVM obliteration rates were similar between the matched E + SRS vs SRS-only cohorts (48.5% vs 54.5%; odds ratio = 0.788, P =. 399). Cumulative probabilities of obliteration at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were also similar between the E + SRS (33.0%, 46.4%, 56.2%, and 60.8%, respectively) and SRS-only (32.9%, 46.2%, 56.0%, and 60.6%, respectively) cohorts (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 1.005, P =. 981). Cumulative probabilities of radiologic RIC at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were lower in the E + SRS (25.0%, 25.7%, 26.7%, and 26.7%, respectively) vs SRS-only (45.3%, 46.2%, 47.8%, and 47.8%, respectively) cohort (SHR = 0.478, P =. 004). Symptomatic and asymptomatic embolization-related complication rates were 8.3% and 18.6%, respectively. Rates of post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, symptomatic RIC, and cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study refutes the prevalent notion that AVM embolization negatively affects the likelihood of obliteration after SRS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-321
Number of pages9
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume88
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Versus without Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this