Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research

Amy C. Moors, Jes L. Matsick, Ali Ziegler, Jennifer D. Rubin, Terri D. Conley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations


In our target article, "The Fewer the Merrier: Assessing Stigma Surrounding Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships," we documented a robust stigma toward consensual nonmonogamous relationships and a halo surrounding monogamous relationships. In the present piece, we respond to six commentaries of our target article with the aim of promoting future research and policy change. First, we address questions and concerns raised by commentators using existing data and found that regardless of perceived relationship happiness, sexual orientation, or gender (of experimental targets), individuals in consensual nonmonogamous relationships were more negatively viewed on a variety of qualities (both relationship-specific and nonrelationship specific) compared to those in monogamous relationships. Second, we suggest productive future research avenues with regards to implications for social change, and strengthening methodology used in consensual nonmonogamous research. Finally, we consider common ground among the commentators as an avenue to promote coalition building through the examinations of prejudice toward individuals in nonnormative romantic relationships. We conclude that this is only the beginning of a fruitful line of research and argue that the stigma toward departures from monogamy is robust and, of course, worthy of additional research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-69
Number of pages18
JournalAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this