(Still) waiting in the wings: Group-based biases in leaders' decisions about to whom power is relinquished

Nathaniel J. Ratcliff, Theresa K. Vescio, Julia L. Dahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research examined whether leaders exhibit race-based and gender-based biases in decisions about to whom to relinquish power. Across three studies, participants were placed in leadership roles in a simulated, online competition with either White male and/or Black male co-workers (Study 1a/1b) or White male and White female co-workers (Study 2). Results showed that after learning of their poor performance as leaders, participants relinquished more power to White male co-workers than Black male co-worker and more power to White male co-workers than White female co-workers. Together, the findings offer a novel examination of when and to whom power is given which can further inform our understanding of the underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in leadership domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-30
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume57
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(Still) waiting in the wings: Group-based biases in leaders' decisions about to whom power is relinquished'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this