Abstract
This research examined whether leaders exhibit race-based and gender-based biases in decisions about to whom to relinquish power. Across three studies, participants were placed in leadership roles in a simulated, online competition with either White male and/or Black male co-workers (Study 1a/1b) or White male and White female co-workers (Study 2). Results showed that after learning of their poor performance as leaders, participants relinquished more power to White male co-workers than Black male co-worker and more power to White male co-workers than White female co-workers. Together, the findings offer a novel examination of when and to whom power is given which can further inform our understanding of the underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in leadership domains.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23-30 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
| Volume | 57 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '(Still) waiting in the wings: Group-based biases in leaders' decisions about to whom power is relinquished'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver